Judicial Review of Asylum Claims at the Border- Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

被引：0

作者：

Stobb, Maureen ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Georgia Southern Univ, Polit Sci, Statesboro, GA 30458 USA

来源：

JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL | 2021年 / 42卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/0098261X.2021.1994799

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：225 / 226

页数：2

共 47 条

[1] Lives in the Balance: Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security
Settlage, Rachel Gonzalez
[J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2015, 130 (04) : 799 - 800
[2] Lives in the balance: Asylum adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security
Comerford, Caroline V.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW, 2014, 24 (04) : 420 - 421
[3] Lives in the Balance: Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security
不详
[J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2014, 43 (04) : 596 - 596
[4] Lives in the Balance: Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security.
Ikegwuruka, Cosmas Ukachukwu
[J]. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW, 2016, 50 (03) : E47 - E49
[5] Fifth Amendment - Due Process Clause - Equal Protection - Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2020, 134 (01) : 510 - 519
[6] THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF THE LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF RELIANCE INTERESTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Muniz, Raquel
Lewis, Maria
Cavanaugh, Grace
Woolsey, Melissa
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2022, 95 (04) : 857 - 952
[7] Census Act - Review of Administrative Action - Judicial Review of Pretext - Department of Commerce v. New York
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2019, 133 (01) : 372 - 381
[8] MARBURY V. MADISON AND THE DOCTRINE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
Corwin, Edward S.
[J]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1914, 12 (07) : 538 - 572
[9] JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS - CROWELL v. BENSON
不详
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1932, 41 (07): : 1037 - 1056
[10] Marbury v. Madison: The origins and legacy of judicial review
Shrewsbury, SM
[J]. MILITARY LAW REVIEW, 2002, 173 : 160 - 168

← 1 2 3 4 5 →