Fostering critical pluralism with systems theory, methods, and heuristics

被引:4
|
作者
Kish, K. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Mallery, D. [2 ,6 ]
Haage, G. Yahya [1 ,6 ]
Melgar-Melgar, R. [3 ,5 ]
Burke, M. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Orr, C. [4 ,6 ]
Smolyar, N. L. [3 ,5 ]
Sanniti, S. [4 ]
Larson, J. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Nat Resource Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] York Univ, Fac Urban & Environm Change, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Environm, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm, Resource, Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[5] Leadership Ecozo, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Econ Anthropocene, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Soft systems methodology; Critical systems heuristics; Participatory action research; Sociological paradigms; Ecological economics; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; TRANSITIONS; DYNAMICS; WORLD; EROI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107171
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological economics and systems theory have a long-standing history. As a foregrounding metatheoretical framework, systems thinking deepens socio-ecological acuity through comprehensive models of complex relationships between social and biophysical systems. However, critical and soft systems are often overlooked, necessitating a framework for "critical pluralism," similar to that used by systems theorists themselves. To do this, we argue that ecological economics needs to include paradigm analysis as an integral part of the ecological economic discourse to situate work within sociological paradigms - not just biophysical limits to growth. To help establish a critical pluralism approach, we trained a group of emerging ecological economics scholars to integrate systems thinking more firmly in research approaches. We integrate soft systems methodology and critical systems heuristics to establish foundations for critical soft systems methodology. We then trained emerging scholars on this new methodology. Emergent from the results of this training is a new paradigm of thought, centred on regenerative features, for the future of ecological economics - which is best navigated with critical pluralistic approaches. The results of this training also present lessons for the discipline of ecological economics that help chart out the discipline's tensions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CRITICAL SYSTEMS AND THE PROBLEM OF PLURALISM
    MIDGLEY, G
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 20 (03) : 219 - 231
  • [2] Critical Systems Heuristics: a Systematic Review
    Hutcheson, Matthew
    Morton, Alec
    Blair, Shona
    [J]. SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2024, 37 (04) : 499 - 514
  • [3] Toward Valuing With Critical Systems Heuristics
    Gates, Emily F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2018, 39 (02) : 201 - 220
  • [4] Ecumenical critical theory, pluralism and developmental trends
    Domingues, Jose Mauricio
    [J]. THESIS ELEVEN, 2024, 181 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [5] Critical by design: Fostering responsible innovation with critical design methods
    O'Gorman, Marcel
    Lajoie, Jason
    Pearl, Zach
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (ISTAS21): TECHNOLOGICAL STEWARDSHIP & RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2021,
  • [6] Fostering responsible innovation with critical design methods
    Orchard, Alexi
    O'Gorman, Marcel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [7] CRITICAL HEURISTICS OF SOCIAL-SYSTEMS DESIGN
    ULRICH, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1987, 31 (03) : 276 - 283
  • [8] Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond
    Gerald Midgley
    [J]. Systems practice, 1997, 10 : 37 - 57
  • [9] Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond
    Midgley, G
    [J]. SYSTEMS PRACTICE, 1997, 10 (01) : 37 - 57
  • [10] COMPARATIVE LAW METHODS: METHODOLOGICAL PLURALISM AND A CRITICAL COMPARATISM
    Brener, Paula
    Colombi, Henry
    Ramos, Marcelo Maciel
    [J]. REVISTA ACADEMICA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DO RECIFE, 2021, 93 (01): : 212 - 226