共 50 条
Digital Health Professions Education on Diabetes Management: Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration
被引:25
|作者:
Huang, Zhilian
[1
,2
]
Semwal, Monika
[1
]
Lee, Shuen Yee
[3
]
Tee, Mervin
[4
]
Ong, William
[2
]
Tan, Woan Shin
[1
,2
,5
]
Bajpai, Ram
[1
]
Car, Lorainne Tudor
[6
]
机构:
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci CePHaS, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch, Inst Hlth Technol HealthTech NTU, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Sch Mech Aerosp & Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Healthcare Grp, Hlth Serv & Outcomes Res Dept, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Family Med & Primary Care, 11 Mandalay Rd,Level 18,Clinical Sci Bldg, Singapore 308232, Singapore
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
evidence-based practice;
health personnel;
learning;
systematic review;
diabetes mellitus;
GLYCEMIC CONTROL;
INTERVENTION;
PHYSICIAN;
CARE;
PROGRAM;
GUIDELINES;
KNOWLEDGE;
GRADE;
D O I:
10.2196/12997
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: There is a shortage of health care professionals competent in diabetes management worldwide. Digital education is increasingly used in educating health professionals on diabetes. Digital diabetes self-management education for patients has been shown to improve patients' knowledge and outcomes. However, the effectiveness of digital education on diabetes management for health care professionals is still unknown. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and economic impact of digital education in improving health care professionals' knowledge, skills, attitudes, satisfaction, and competencies. We also assessed its impact on patient outcomes and health care professionals' behavior. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of digitalized diabetes management education for health care professionals pre- and postregistration. Publications from 1990 to 2017 were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, and Web of Science. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by 2 authors. Results: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of digital education modality, comparators, outcome measures, and intervention duration. Most studies comparing digital or blended education to traditional education reported significantly higher knowledge and skills scores in the intervention group. There was little or no between-group difference in patient outcomes or economic impact. Most studies were judged at a high or unclear risk of bias. Conclusions: Digital education seems to be more effective than traditional education in improving diabetes management-related knowledge and skills. The paucity and low quality of the available evidence call for urgent and well-designed studies focusing on important outcomes such as health care professionals' behavior, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness as well as its impact in diverse settings, including developing countries.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文