The anthropology of personal identity: Intellectual property rights issues in Papua New Guinea, West Papua and Australia

This paper discusses large-scale genealogical work at three projects in Papua New Guinea, West Papua and Australia and considers three questions: in what respects is genealogy intellectual property (IP) and, if so, who owns it; what were the regimes of permissions that permitted the collection of genealogical knowledge in each of the three cases; and what duty of care do collectors/curators of genealogical knowledge have in respect of preservation and safeguarding against improper use? It is argued that a new form of 'emergent' knowledge arises in which intellectual property rights (IPR) are unclear. What is more certain is that anthropologists owe a 'cultural heritage duty of care' towards genealogical information. The key criterion is that anthropologists must be in a position, and allowed by those who employ them, to guarantee 'unbroken oversight' of genealogical materials regardless of what media they are on or how they are stored.