Neuroenhancement in surgeons: benefits, risks and ethical dilemmas

被引:10
|
作者
Patel, R. [1 ]
Ashcroft, J. [1 ]
Darzi, A. [1 ]
Singh, H. [1 ]
Leff, D. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, St Marys Hosp Campus,10th Floor, London W2 1NY, England
关键词
DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; STRESS; ACQUISITION; ENGAGEMENT; TASK;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11601
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgeons traditionally aim to reduce mistakes in healthcare through repeated training and advancement of surgical technology. Recently, performance-enhancing interventions such as neurostimulation are emerging which may offset errors in surgical practice. Methods Use of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a novel neuroenhancement technique that has been applied to surgeons to improve surgical technical performance, was reviewed. Evidence supporting tDCS improvements in motor and cognitive performance outside of the field of surgery was assessed and correlated with emerging research investigating tDCS in the surgical setting and potential applications to wider aspects of healthcare. Ethical considerations and future implications of using tDCS in surgical training and perioperatively are also discussed. Results Outside of surgery, tDCS studies demonstrate improved motor performance with regards to reaction time, task completion, strength and fatigue, while also suggesting enhanced cognitive function through multitasking, vigilance and attention assessments. In surgery, current research has demonstrated improved performance in open knot-tying, laparoscopic and robotic skills while also offsetting subjective temporal demands. However, a number of ethical issues arise from the potential application of tDCS in surgery in the form of safety, coercion, distributive justice and fairness, all of which must be considered prior to implementation. Conclusion Neuroenhancement may improve motor and cognitive skills in healthcare professions with impact on patient safety. Implementation will require accurate protocols and regulations to balance benefits with the associated ethical dilemmas, and to direct safe use for clinicians and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 950
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Ethical Evaluation of Neuroenhancement
    Kipke, R.
    SUCHTTHERAPIE, 2011, 12 (04) : 152 - 158
  • [2] Cataract surgeons not balancing risks with benefits
    Bozdech, Miloslav
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2007, 42 (06): : 875 - 875
  • [3] Reflecting on the risks and ethical dilemmas of digital research
    Sparks, Hayley
    Collins, Francis L.
    Kearns, Robin
    GEOFORUM, 2016, 77 : 40 - 46
  • [4] Neuroenhancement: an ethical analysis
    Gawkowska, Anna
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2007, : 103 - 109
  • [5] Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing
    Ronak Patel
    Yusuke Suwa
    James Kinross
    Alexander von Roon
    Adam J. Woods
    Ara Darzi
    Harsimrat Singh
    Daniel Richard Leff
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 4803 - 4814
  • [6] Ethical dilemmas in the care of Afghan women by American military surgeons
    Miller, Jenna
    Brown, Douglas
    Keune, Jason
    Kodner, Ira
    Ray, Shuddhadeb
    Steele, Scott R.
    Zihni, Ahmed M.
    SURGERY, 2014, 156 (05) : 1278 - 1281
  • [7] Action ethical dilemmas in surgery: An interview study of practicing surgeons
    Torjuul K.
    Nordam A.
    Sørlie V.
    BMC Medical Ethics, 6 (1)
  • [8] Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs
    Reingold, Rebecca B.
    Gostin, Lawrence O.
    Goodwin, Michele Bratcher
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (17): : 1695 - 1696
  • [9] Live surgery at conferences - Clinical benefits and ethical dilemmas
    Philip-Watson, Joanna
    Khan, Shahid A. A.
    Hadjipavlou, Marios
    Rane, Abhay
    Knoll, Thomas
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 12 (03) : 183 - 186
  • [10] Human embryo freezing: clinical benefits and ethical dilemmas
    Brinsden, PR
    Avery, SM
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 : 64 - 65