Freedom, foreknowledge, and dependence

被引:2
|
作者
Wasserman, Ryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Washington Univ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
来源
NOUS | 2021年 / 55卷 / 03期
关键词
belief; dependence; foreknowledge; freedom; theological fatalism; DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE; SOFT FACTS; TIME; GOD; TRUTH; PARADOXES; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/nous.12317
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The idea that some of God's past beliefs depend on our future actions has a long history, going back to Origen in the third century CE. However, it is not always clear what this idea amounts to, since it is not always clear what kind of dependence is at issue. This paper surveys five different interpretations of dependence and, in each case, considers the implications for the debate over theological fatalism. Along the way, we discuss a number of related issues, including the nature of explanation, the scope of metaphysical grounding, and the possibility of backward causation.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 622
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条