Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study

被引:14
|
作者
Scott, Jason [1 ]
Heavey, Emily [2 ]
Waring, Justin [3 ]
Jones, Diana [4 ]
Dawson, Pamela [4 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] York Univ, Social Policy Res Unit, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Hlth Innovat Leadership & Learning, Nottingham, England
[4] Northumbria Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 07期
关键词
ADVERSE EVENTS; INVOLVEMENT; TRANSITIONS; CONTINUITY; HOSPITALS; INTERVENTION; PARTICIPATE; DISCHARGE; TIME; PMOS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. Design: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with participants, and cognitive interviews were thematically analysed using a deductive approach based on the developed feedback mechanism. Participants: Expert patients (n=5) and healthcare professionals (n=11) were recruited purposively to develop the feedback mechanism in 2 workshops. Workshop 1 explored principles underpinning safety feedback mechanisms, and workshop 2 included the practical development of the feedback mechanism. Final design and content of the feedback mechanism (a safety survey) were verified by workshop participants, and cognitive interviews (n=28) were conducted with patients. Results: Workshop participants identified that safety feedback mechanisms should be patient-centred, short and concise with clear signposting on how to complete, with an option to be anonymous and balanced between positive (safe) and negative (unsafe) experiences. The agreed feedback mechanism consisted of a survey split across 3 stages of the care transfer: departure, journey and arrival. Care across organisational boundaries was recognised as being complex, with healthcare professionals acknowledging the difficulty implementing changes that impact other organisations. Cognitive interview participants agreed the content of the survey was relevant but identified barriers to completion relating to the survey formatting and understanding of a care transfer. Conclusions: Participatory, codesign principles helped overcome differences in understandings of safety in the complex setting of care transfers when developing a safety survey. Practical barriers to the survey's usability and acceptability to patients were identified, resulting in a modified survey design. Further research is required to determine the usability and acceptability of the survey to patients and healthcare professionals, as well as identifying how governance structures should accommodate patient feedback when relating to multiple health or social care providers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Service users' experiences with mobile safety alarms in home care: A qualitative study
    Nordang, Elise Flakk
    Halvorsen, Kristin
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (04): : 2063 - 2072
  • [2] Putting the patient' in patient safety: a qualitative study of consumer experiences
    Rathert, Cheryl
    Brandt, Julie
    Williams, Eric S.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2012, 15 (03) : 327 - 336
  • [3] Service users' experiences of contacting NHS patient medicines helpline services: a qualitative study
    Williams, Matt
    Jordan, Abbie
    Scott, Jennifer
    Jones, Matthew D.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [4] Patient transfer from intensive care units to general wards: An exploratory qualitative study of ward nurses' experiences of patient safety
    Nikolaisen, Mette Kure
    Fridh, Stina
    Olsen, Brita Fosser
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (10): : 6769 - 6776
  • [5] PATIENT AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIEWS ON A PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD IN HAEMOPHILIA CARE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Brands, M.
    Driessens, M.
    van der Meer, F.
    Meijer, S.
    Goedhart, G.
    van der Bom, J.
    Haverman, L.
    Cnossen, M.
    Fijnvandraat, K.
    Gouw, S.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2021, 27 : 103 - 103
  • [6] A qualitative study of patient experiences of decentralized acute healthcare services
    Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist
    Del Busso, Lilliana
    Grondahl, Vigdis Abrahamsen
    Ghanima, Waleed
    Barach, Paul
    Jelsness-Jorgensen, Lars-Petter
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2016, 34 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [7] Patient involvement for improved patient safety: A qualitative study of nurses' perceptions and experiences
    Skagerstrom, Janna
    Ericsson, Carin
    Nilsen, Per
    Ekstedt, Mirjam
    Schildmeijer, Kristina
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2017, 4 (04): : 230 - 239
  • [8] Emphasising Organisational Routine: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Health Professional Experiences of Inpatient Oncology Care
    Watermeyer, Jennifer
    Etheredge, Harriet
    Fabian, June
    Tager, Sue
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [9] Healthcare workers' experiences of patient safety in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicentre qualitative study
    Berggren, Karin
    Ekstedt, Mirjam
    Joelsson-Alm, Eva
    Swedberg, Lena
    Sackey, Peter
    Schandl, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7372 - 7381
  • [10] A qualitative study of patient and professional perspectives of healthcare services for multiple sclerosis: implications for service development and policy
    Methley, Abigail M.
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
    Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2017, 25 (03) : 848 - 857