共 50 条
Utility of the Personality Assessment Inventory for Detecting Malingered ADHD in College Students
被引:20
|作者:
Musso, Mandi W.
[1
]
Hill, Benjamin D.
[2
]
Barker, Alyse A.
[1
]
Pella, Russell D.
[3
]
Gouvier, Wm Drew
[1
]
机构:
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Mobile, AL USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Neurol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词:
malingering;
adult ADHD;
college students;
comorbid psychopathology;
Personality Assessment Inventory;
DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER;
PRESCRIPTION STIMULANTS;
HEAD-INJURY;
ILLICIT USE;
ADULT ADHD;
WMS-III;
SCALE;
BOYS;
UNDERGRADUATE;
COMORBIDITY;
D O I:
10.1177/1087054714548031
中图分类号:
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号:
040202 ;
摘要:
Objective: The purpose of the current study is to examine the utility of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) for detecting feigned ADHD in college students. Method: A sample of 238 undergraduate students was recruited and asked to simulate ADHD (ADHD simulators) or respond honestly (controls) on the PAI. Archival data (n = 541) from individuals diagnosed with clinical ADHD, no diagnosis, learning disorder, mood/anxiety, comorbid ADHD-mood/anxiety, or suspect effort were used. Results: Few individuals scored above the cutoffs on PAI validity scales. When alternative cutoff scores were examined, cutoffs of 77 on the Negative Impression Management (NIM) scale, 3 on the Malingering Index (MAL), and 1 on the Rogers Discriminant Function (RDF) yielded excellent specificity in all groups and sensitivities of .33, .30, and .20, respectively. Conclusion: Individuals who were asked to simulate ADHD easily manipulate the PAI; however, alternative cutoff scores proposed for PAI validity indices may improve the detection of feigned ADHD symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 774
页数:12
相关论文