New implant designs for fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone

被引:13
|
作者
Goldhahn, J. [1 ,2 ]
Seebeck, J. [2 ]
Frei, R. [3 ]
Frenz, M. [4 ]
Antoniadis, I. [5 ,6 ]
Schneider, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Schulthess Clin, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] AO Res Inst, Davos, Switzerland
[3] AO Dev Inst, Davos, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Inst Appl Phys, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Cortical bone; Fixation; Implant; Laser; Osteoporosis;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-004-1765-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Screws are one of the limiting factors for fixation of implants, particularly in poor bone quality. A class of new implants with an implant-bone-interface optimized regarding load transition by increasing the peripheral area might improve the anchorage of implants in osteoporotic bone. However, the shape of these implants requires new technologies for insertion. The goal of the work presented here was to analyze the relevant parameters regarding implant geometry and to demonstrate the effect of new procedures for their insertion. The investigation was divided into three parts: 1) implant design optimisation, 2) efficiency of cortical bone ablation, and 3) implant insertion technology. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to investigate the influence of the number of lobes, the radius of the outer curvature and additional milling to remove any sharp changes of section around the lobe. Opening of the cortical bone with an Er:YAG laser was studied using calf cortex from 2 to 7 mm thickness. The effect of a) pulse energy and pulse duration, b) cortical thickness, c) wet or dry boundary conditions on volume and geometry of ablated bone, time required to penetrate the cortical bone and local bone tissue damage was quantified. Pneumatic and ultrasound based insertion were compared in the third experiment. The cortical bone was prepared in the following ways: a) no opening, b) predrilling of three holes (1 mm diameter each) and c) exact pre-cutting of the whole contour. Increasing the radius of the outer curvature from 2 to 5 mm reduces the peak stresses during loading in all planes in the implant as well as in the adjacent cortical bone by about 30-40%. An increase in the number of lobes from two to three decreases the mean peak stress by about 46% (alpha < 0.001) and the range between the minimal and maximal peak stresses for different loading directions by about 83%. Penetration of cortical bone with an Er:YAG laser was possible up to a cortical thickness of 6 mm with fewer than 100 pulses. The ablation rate per pulse increased more with increasing duration than with increasing energy. Signs of bone damage such as melting were only visible when high pulse energies and durations were used. Insertion of the prototype was possible with all devices, but only when the whole contour was cut out of the cortical bone. However, the use of the ultrasound vibrator led to heating up of the tissue fluid and subsequently to water evaporation and tissue damage. Insertion of the prototype was possible with both pneumatic vibrators, but only when the whole contour was cut out of the cortical bone. New implant designs may lead to reduced stress peaks in the surrounding bone and might be inserted with the help of new insertion technologies, namely laser cutting of cortical bone and pneumatic vibration. Further studies are required to optimize these technologies prior to clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:S112 / S119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New implant designs for fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone
    J. Goldhahn
    J. Seebeck
    R. Frei
    B. Frenz
    I. Antoniadis
    E. Schneider
    [J]. Osteoporosis International, 2005, 16 : S112 - S119
  • [2] Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Kyle D. Anderson
    Frank C. Ko
    Amarjit S. Virdi
    D. Rick Sumner
    Ryan D. Ross
    [J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2020, 18 : 577 - 586
  • [3] Augmentation of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Clifford B. Jones
    [J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2012, 10 : 328 - 336
  • [4] Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Anderson, Kyle D.
    Ko, Frank C.
    Virdi, Amarjit S.
    Sumner, D. Rick
    Ross, Ryan D.
    [J]. CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2020, 18 (05) : 577 - 586
  • [5] Augmentation of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Jones, Clifford B.
    [J]. CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2012, 10 (04) : 328 - 336
  • [6] Periprosthetic fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone
    Lenz, Mark
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    Waehnert, Dirk
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 : S44 - S50
  • [7] Failure of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone
    von Ruedena, Christian
    Augat, Peter
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 : S3 - S10
  • [8] When is the stability of a fracture fixation limited by osteoporotic bone?
    Konstantinidis, Lukas
    Helwig, Peter
    Hirschmueller, Anja
    Langenmair, Elia
    Suedkampa, Norbert P.
    Augat, Peter
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 : S27 - S32
  • [9] Biomechanical considerations of fracture reduction and fixation in osteoporotic bone
    Chao, E
    Kim, Y
    Inoue, N
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 : S4 - S4
  • [10] Improved anchorage in osteoporotic vertebrae with new implant designs
    Goldhahn, J
    Reinhold, M
    Stauber, M
    Knop, C
    Frei, R
    Schneider, E
    Linke, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2006, 24 (05) : 917 - 925