Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon

被引:31
|
作者
Hartmann, D
Bassler, B
Schilling, D
Pfeiffer, B
Jakobs, R
Eickhoff, A
Riemann, JF
Layer, G
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Med Gastroenterol C, Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Acad Teaching Hosp, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-870309
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Study Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate dark-lumen magnetic resonance (MR) colonography prospectively in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy underwent same-day dark-lumen MR colonography on the basis of a standard protocol. The depiction of colorectal diseases was assessed in the following colon segments: cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. The reasons for incomplete colonoscopy included high-grade stenosis in 26 patients (four with occlusive cancer, 12 with fibrotic stenosis based on recurrent sigmoid diverticulitis, eight with Crohn ' s-induced stenosis, and two with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug colonopathy), extreme patient intolerance in one patient, and technical challenges associated with an elongated colon in five patients. The results of MR colonography were compared with the findings of the initial conventional colonoscopy, the histopathological outcome, and follow-up colonoscopy when possible. Results: All high-grade stenoses were confirmed on MR colono-graphic data sets. Of the 26 patients with high-grade stenosis, 19 underwent surgery with histopathological confirmation of the initial diagnosis. Follow-up colonoscopy was carried out in 14 patients with surgically treated high-grade stenosis. In six of these 14 patients, nine polyps identified at the initial MR colono-graphy were confirmed and removed during a postoperative conventional colonoscopy. Two polyps (5 mm and 8 mm in diameter) identified on postoperative conventional colonoscopy had not been seen preoperatively at MR colonography. One polyp seen on MR colonography was not identified in the follow-up colonoscopy. Conclusion: Dark-lumen MR colonography is a feasible and useful method of evaluating the entire colon in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:816 / 820
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CT colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Evaluation of a colon dissection mode (filet view) for virtual colonoscopy
    Gschossmann, Juergen M.
    Hoppe, Hanno
    Vock, Peter
    Saar, Bettina
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A190 - A190
  • [2] MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy
    Ajaj, W
    Lauenstein, TC
    Pelster, G
    Holtmann, G
    Ruehm, SG
    Debatin, JF
    Goehde, SC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) : 452 - 459
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Colonography for the Evaluation of Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Correlation With Conventional Colonoscopy
    Ergen, F. Bilge
    Akata, Deniz
    Hayran, Mutlu
    Harmanci, Ozgur
    Arslan, Serap
    Basaran, Ceyla
    Hussain, Hero K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2008, 32 (06) : 848 - 854
  • [4] CT Colonography in Older Patients with Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy or Contraindications to Colonoscopy
    Lev-Toaff, A. S.
    Yucel, C.
    Bergin, D.
    Durrani, H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [5] Patient acceptance of magnetic resonance colonography: prospective comparison to conventional colonoscopy
    Hartmann, D.
    Bassler, B.
    Pfeifer, B.
    Eickhoff, A.
    Weickert, U.
    Riemann, J. F.
    Layer, G.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2006, 131 (45) : 2519 - 2523
  • [6] Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy
    Wong, Tammy Yuen-yee
    Lam, Wynnie Wai-man
    So, Nina Man-ching
    Lee, Janet Fung-yee
    Leung, Ka-lau
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (01): : 56 - 63
  • [7] Colon capsule endoscopy vs CT-colonography in the evaluation of patients with incomplete colonoscopy
    Spada, Cristiano
    Hassan, Cesare
    Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli
    Cesaro, Paola
    Barbaro, Brunella
    Iafrate, Franco
    Petruzziello, Lucio
    Laghi, Andrea
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    Costamagna, Guido
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 31 - 32
  • [8] Prospective study on, bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy
    Saar, B.
    Meining, A.
    Beer, A.
    Settles, M.
    Helmberger, H.
    Frimberger, E.
    Rummeny, E. J.
    Roesch, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (952): : 235 - 241
  • [9] Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions
    Pappalardo, G
    Polettini, E
    Frattaroli, FM
    Casciani, E
    D'Orta, C
    D'Amato, M
    Gualdi, GF
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 119 (02) : 300 - 304
  • [10] Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology
    Ajaj, W
    Pelster, G
    Treichel, U
    Vogt, FM
    Debatin, JF
    Ruehm, SG
    Lauenstein, TC
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (12) : 1738 - 1743