Which countries avoid carbon-intensive development?

被引:15
|
作者
Lamb, William F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Torgauer Str 1215, D-10829 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Sustainable development goals; Human well-being; Cumulative emissions; Climate change; Energy pathways; ECOLOGICALLY UNEQUAL EXCHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY; CONVERGENCE; TRADE; CHALLENGES; EMISSIONS; HISTORY; NATIONS; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.148
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper explores the underlying development outcomes and cumulative emissions trajectories of 20 middle-income countries from Eastern Europe, Latin America, North Africa and South Asia. First, wellbeing outcomes are assessed, defined in terms of access to education, democratic and legal rights, and the infrastructures that support physical health. Second, emissions trajectories are estimated to 2050, taking into account current trends in energy consumption and carbon intensity, a likely start-date for stringent climate policy arising from the Paris Agreement (2020), and maximum feasible rates of mitigation. Comparing these estimates to a per capita allocation from the global carbon budget associated with 2 degrees C, ten countries have low-carbon development trends that will not exceed their allocation. Of these, Costa Rica and Uruguay are achieving very high well-being outcomes, while many more are delivering good outcomes in at least two domains of human need. However, most are seriously deficient in terms of social well-being (education, democratic and legal rights). These results call into question the socio-economic convergence of developing countries with industrialised countries; but they also reaffirm the low-emissions cost of extending good infrastructure access and physical health outcomes to all, demonstrated by the existence of multiple countries that continue to avoid carbon-intensive development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 533
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of income inequality on carbon-intensive extractivism
    Cho, Hyangsuk
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [2] The challenges of maturity mismatch in investment and financing for sustainable development of carbon-intensive enterprises
    Huwei Wen
    Lijun Jiang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 99541 - 99560
  • [3] The challenges of maturity mismatch in investment and financing for sustainable development of carbon-intensive enterprises
    Wen, Huwei
    Jiang, Lijun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (44) : 99541 - 99560
  • [4] Climate change mitigation strategies in carbon-intensive firms
    Cadez, Simon
    Czerny, Albert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4132 - 4143
  • [5] Greenwashing gas: Might a 'transition fuel' label legitimize carbon-intensive natural gas development?
    Stephenson, Eleanor
    Doukas, Alexander
    Shaw, Karena
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 46 : 452 - 459
  • [6] Carbon-intensive industries in Socially Responsible mutual funds' portfolios
    Munoz, Fernando
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 75
  • [7] Crypto swings and the performance of carbon-intensive equity funds in China
    Umar, Muhammad
    Ji, Xiangfeng
    Mirza, Nawazish
    Li, Haiping
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 78
  • [8] A participatory approach to sustainable energy strategy development in a carbon-intensive jurisdiction: The case of Nova Scotia
    Adams, Michelle
    Wheeler, David
    Woolston, Genna
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2550 - 2559
  • [9] "Pandora's box" regarding hydropower: Carbon-intensive reflection
    Zhao, Rui
    Shi, Kai
    Neighbour, Gareth
    Liu, Chunqiong
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 19 (01) : 284 - 286
  • [10] The impact of implementing a consumption charge on carbon-intensive materials in Europe
    Pollitt, Hector
    Neuhoff, Karsten
    Lin, Xinru
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 : S74 - S89