Health Coaching Strategies for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Sieczkowska, Sofia Mendes [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
de Lima, Alisson Padilha [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Swinton, Paul Alan [6 ]
Dolan, Eimear [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Roschel, Hamilton [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gualano, Bruno [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Appl Physiol & Nutr Res Grp, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Lab Assessment & Conditioning Rheumatol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, FMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Fac IELUSC, Sch Phys Educ, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[6] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
behavior change; weight loss; health coaching; weight; BMI; waist circumference; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SERIOUS MENTAL-ILLNESS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PROGRAM; INTERVENTION; GUIDELINES; OBESITY; ADULTS; TRANSPARENCY; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1093/advances/nmaa159
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Health coaching has emerged as a potential supporting tool for health professionals to overcome behavioral barriers, but its efficacy in weight management remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize and evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the use of self-reported health coaching for weight loss. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Psyinfo, Virtual Health Library, and Scielo) were independently searched from inception to May 2020. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations. Any study that investigated a self-reported health coaching intervention with the goal of inducing weight loss in individuals of any age, health, or training status was considered for inclusion. Quantitative data were analyzed using multilevel hierarchical metaregression models conducted within a Bayesian framework. A total of 653 studies were screened and 38 were selected for inclusion. The quality of evidence supporting outcomes based on the entire evidence base was very low and studies were deemed to have high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of controlled studies provided evidence of an effect favoring coaching compared with usual care but was trivial in magnitude [effect size (ES) 0.5 :-0.09; 95% credible interval (CrI): -0.17, -0.02]. The multilevel extension of Egger's regression-intercept test indicated the existence of publication bias, whereas a sensitivity analysis based only on those studies deemed to be of high quality provided no evidence of an effect of coaching on weight loss (ES 0.5 : -0.04; 95% CrI: -0.12, 0.09). Considered collectively, the results of this investigation indicate that the available evidence is not of sufficient quality to support the use of self-reported health coaching as a health care intervention for weight loss.
引用
收藏
页码:1449 / 1460
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on "Health Coaching: 100 Strategies for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"
    Sforzo, Gary A.
    Moore, Margaret
    Moore, Geoff E.
    Harenberg, Sebastian
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2021, 12 (03) : 1042 - 1043
  • [2] Comment on "Health Coaching: 100 Strategies for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Reply
    Sieczkowska, Sofia Mendes
    de Lima, Alisson Padilha
    Swinton, Paul Alan
    Dolan, Eimear
    Roschel, Hamilton
    Gualano, Bruno
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2021, 12 (03) : 1043 - 1044
  • [3] The Role of Choice in Weight Loss Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leavy, Jill M.
    Clifton, Peter M.
    Keogh, Jennifer B.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [4] Strategies to reduce attrition in weight loss interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pirotta, Stephanie
    Joham, Anju
    Hochberg, Lisa
    Moran, Lisa
    Lim, Siew
    Hindle, Annemarie
    Brennan, Leah
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2019, 20 (10) : 1400 - 1412
  • [5] Probiotics for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, Sunmin
    Bae, Ji-Hyun
    [J]. NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (07) : 566 - 575
  • [6] The nudge strategies for weight loss in adults with obesity and overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Ruxue
    Zhang, Yating
    Cai, Xue
    Luo, Dan
    Zhou, Wuai
    Long, Tianxue
    Zhang, Huijing
    Jiang, Hua
    Li, Mingzi
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 125 (12) : 1527 - 1535
  • [7] Effectiveness of health coaching on diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Radwan, Nashwa Mohamed
    Al Khashan, Hisham
    Alamri, Fahad
    El Olemy, Ahmed Tofek
    [J]. TRADITIONAL MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2019, 4 (06): : 314 - 325
  • [8] Fruit consumption and weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Delpino, Felipe Mendes
    [J]. RBONE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OBESIDADE NUTRICAO E EMAGRECIMENTO, 2020, 14 (91): : 1367 - 1375
  • [9] Islamic fasting and weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Motaghipisheh, Shahrzad
    Kolahdooz, Fariba
    Zahedi, Mohammad J.
    Haghdoost, Ali A.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2014, 17 (02) : 396 - 406
  • [10] The effect of physical exercise strategies on weight loss in postpartum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nascimento, S. L.
    Pudwell, J.
    Surita, F. G.
    Adamo, K. B.
    Smith, G. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2014, 38 (05) : 626 - 635