Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines?

被引:10
|
作者
Mamtani, Anita [1 ]
Zabor, Emily C. [2 ]
Rosenberger, Laura H. [3 ]
Stempel, Michelle [1 ]
Gemignani, Mary L. [1 ]
Morrow, Monica [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Breast Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Biostat Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONSERVING SURGERY; STAGE-I; CONSERVATION; MASTECTOMY; IRRADIATION; REOPERATION; ASSOCIATION; LUMPECTOMY;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-019-07751-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. The Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guidelines defined a negative margin for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as no ink on tumor, and implementation has reduced rates of additional surgery for patients with invasive ductal cancer (IDC). The outcomes for invasive lobular cancer (ILC) patients are uncertain. Methods. This study identified patients who had stage 1 or 2 ILC treated with BCS from January 2010 to February 2018. The guidelines were adopted 1 January 2014. Clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status, and reexcisions were compared before and after adoption of the guidelines and with those of IDC patients treated from May 2013 to February 2015. Results. Among 745 early-stage ILC patients undergoing BCT, 312 (42%) were treated before the guidelines and 433 (58%) after the guidelines. Most clinicopathologic characteristics were similar between the two groups, with differences in lobular carcinoma in situ, lymphovascular invasion, and node-positivity rates. The overall rates of additional surgery declined significantly after the guidelines (31.4 to 23.1%; p = 0.01), but the difference did not reach significance for reexcisions (19.9 to 15.2%; p = 0.12) or conversions to mastectomy (11.5 to 7.9%; p = 0.099) individually. Between eras, no difference in incidence or number of tumor on ink or <= 2 mm margins was observed (all p = 0.2). Larger tumors, younger age, and pre-guideline era were independently associated with additional surgery. Only younger age was predictive of mastectomy. Among 431 pre-guideline and 601 post-guideline IDC patients, reexcisions declined from 21.3 to 14.8% (p = 0.008), and conversion to mastectomy was rare (0.6%). The magnitude of reduction in any additional surgery (interaction, p = 0.92) and reexcisions (interaction, p = 0.56) was similar between ILC and IDC. Conclusions. Despite differences in growth pattern and conspicuity, guideline adoption significantly reduced additional surgery among ILC patients, with a magnitude of benefit similar to that among IDC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:3856 / 3862
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines?
    Anita Mamtani
    Emily C. Zabor
    Laura H. Rosenberger
    Michelle Stempel
    Mary L. Gemignani
    Monica Morrow
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 3856 - 3862
  • [2] Did the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines Reduce Additional Surgery in Patients with Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer?
    Mamtani, A.
    Zabor, E.
    Stempel, M.
    Rosenberger, L. H.
    Gemignani, M.
    Morrow, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S72 - S73
  • [3] Impact of SSO-ASTRO “No Ink on Tumor” Guidelines on Reexcision Rates among Older Breast Cancer Patients
    Nina Tamirisa
    Xiudong Lei
    Abigail S. Caudle
    Sharon H. Giordano
    Hui Zhao
    Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 3703 - 3713
  • [4] Impact of SSO-ASTRO "No Ink on Tumor" Guidelines on Reexcision Rates among Older Breast Cancer Patients
    Tamirisa, Nina
    Lei, Xiudong
    Caudle, Abigail S.
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Zhao, Hui
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (07) : 3703 - 3713
  • [5] Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines
    Alberto Nunez
    Veronica Jones
    Katherine Schulz-Costello
    Daniel Schmolze
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [6] Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines
    Nunez, Alberto
    Jones, Veronica
    Schulz-Costello, Katherine
    Schmolze, Daniel
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [7] Influence of the SSO/ASTRO Margin Reexcision Guidelines on Costs Associated with Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Baliski, C. R.
    Pataky, R. E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 632 - 637
  • [8] Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MasterySM Database Following the SSO-ASTRO “No Ink on Tumor” Guidelines
    Amanda M. Schulman
    Jennifer A. Mirrielees
    Glen Leverson
    Jeffrey Landercasper
    Caprice Greenberg
    Lee G. Wilke
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 52 - 58
  • [9] Influence of the SSO/ASTRO Margin Reexcision Guidelines on Costs Associated with Breast-Conserving Surgery
    C. R. Baliski
    R. E. Pataky
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 632 - 637
  • [10] Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MasterySM Database Following the SSO-ASTRO "No Ink on Tumor" Guidelines
    Schulman, Amanda M.
    Mirrielees, Jennifer A.
    Leverson, Glen
    Landercasper, Jeffrey
    Greenberg, Caprice
    Wilke, Lee G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 52 - 58