Examining the Impact of Knowledge Mobilization Strategies to Inform Urban Stakeholders on Accessibility: A Mixed-Methods study

被引:16
|
作者
Labbe, Delphine [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Mahmood, Atiya [3 ]
Miller, William C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ben Mortenson, W. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Rehabil Res Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Gerontol, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3, Canada
[4] ICORD Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Univ Illinois, Disabil & Human Dev, Chicago, IL 60608 USA
关键词
disability; urban; accessibility; participatory research; knowledge translation; evaluation; UNIVERSAL DESIGN; PARTICIPATION; DISABILITY; COMMUNITY; PEOPLE; POLICY; INTERDISCIPLINARY; ENVIRONMENTS; TRANSLATION; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17051561
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban areas offer many opportunities for people with disabilities, but limited accessibility may prevent their full engagement in society. It has been recommended that the experience-based perspective of people with disabilities should be an integral part of the discussion on urban accessibility, complementing other stakeholder expertise to facilitate the design of more inclusive environments. The goals of this mixed-method study were to develop knowledge mobilization (KM) strategies to share experience-based findings on accessibility and evaluate their impact for various urban stakeholders. Using a participatory approach, various KM strategies were developed including videos, a photo exhibit and an interactive game. These strategies were evaluated based on various impact indicators such as reach, usefulness, partnerships and practice changes, using quantitative and qualitative methods. The findings suggested that the KM strategies were effective in raising the awareness of various urban stakeholders and providing information and guidance to urban planning practices related to accessibility.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EXAMINING STRATEGIES TO INCREASE KNOWLEDGE MOBILISATION BETWEEN PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND AND KEY STAKEHOLDERS: A MIXED METHODS STUDY
    Johnson, R.
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    Currie, G.
    Bradley, P.
    Oyebode, O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2017, 71 : A82 - A83
  • [2] Examining the Availability and Accessibility of Rehabilitation Services in a Rural District of South Africa: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Magaqa, Qhayiya
    Ariana, Proochista
    Polack, Sarah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (09)
  • [3] Bluebelle study (phase A): a mixed-methods feasibility study to inform an RCT of surgical wound dressing strategies
    Andronis, Lazaros
    Blazeby, Jane
    Blencowe, Natalie
    Calvert, Melanie
    Coast, Joanna
    Draycott, Tim
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    Longman, Robert
    Magill, Laura
    Mathers, Jonathan
    Pinkney, Tom
    Reeves, Barney
    Rogers, Chris A.
    Torrance, Andrew
    Young, Trudie
    Woodward, Mark
    Bamford, Richard
    Clayton, Gemma
    Dumville, Jo
    Elliott, Daisy
    Ellis, Lucy
    Griffiths, Shelley
    Hurley, Katrina
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    McMullan, Christel
    Main, Barry
    Milne, Thomas
    van der Nelson, Helen
    Nicholson, Alexandra
    Rooshenas, Leila
    Siassakos, Dimitrios
    Strong, Sean
    Talbot, Helen
    Winter, Cathy
    Atherton, G.
    Tafazal, H.
    Eriksson, A.
    Chapman, T.
    Zafar, Z.
    Chang, J.
    Sharma, E.
    Green, N.
    Shariff, U.
    Neito, T.
    Youssef, H.
    Marriott, P.
    Popplewell, M.
    Ring, N.
    Sharples, A.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [4] Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study
    Paddock, Katie
    Woolfall, Kerry
    Kearney, Anna
    Pattison, Natalie
    Frith, Lucy
    Gamble, Carrol
    Welters, Ingeborg
    Trinder, John
    Young, Bridget
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [5] The impact of anencephaly on parents: A mixed-methods study
    Berry, Shandeigh N.
    Severtsen, Billie
    Davis, Andra
    Nelson, Lonnie
    Hutti, Marianne H.
    Oneal, Gail
    [J]. DEATH STUDIES, 2022, 46 (09) : 2198 - 2207
  • [6] Disparities in knowledge and willingness to donate research biospecimens: a mixed-methods study in an underserved urban community
    Dash C.
    Wallington S.F.
    Muthra S.
    Dodson E.
    Mandelblatt J.
    Adams-Campbell L.L.
    [J]. Journal of Community Genetics, 2014, 5 (4) : 329 - 336
  • [7] What Counts? A Mixed-Methods Study to Inform Evaluation of Shelters for Abused Women
    Wathen, C. Nadine
    Harris, Roma M.
    Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn
    Hansen, Michele
    [J]. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2015, 21 (01) : 125 - 146
  • [8] Examining the impact of pulmonary hypertension on nonprofessional caregivers: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Rawlings, Gregg H.
    Beail, Nigel
    Condliffe, Robin
    Kiely, David G.
    Thompson, Andrew R.
    Sabroe, Ian
    Armstrong, Iain
    [J]. PULMONARY CIRCULATION, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [9] A mixed methods study of education researchers' knowledge mobilization approaches
    Farley-Ripple, Elizabeth
    MacGregor, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL CHANGE, 2024,
  • [10] The impact of adolescent suicide on clinicians: a mixed-methods study
    Keightley, P.
    Foster, T.
    Eggins, K.
    Reay, R. E.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2023, 73 (07): : 398 - 403