Linking green infrastructure to urban heat and human health risk mitigation in Oslo, Norway

被引:101
|
作者
Venter, Zander S. [1 ]
Krog, Norun Hjertager [2 ]
Barton, David N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Terr Ecol Sect, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[2] NIPH, Div Infect Control & Environm Hlth, Sect Air Pollut & Noise, POB 222, N-0213 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Ecosystem services; Landsat; Surface temperature; Heat-associated illness; Remote sensing; LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; AIR-TEMPERATURE; VEGETATION INDEX; PUBLIC-HEALTH; ISLAND; MORTALITY; CLIMATE; IMPROVEMENT; RESOLUTION; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136193
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The predicted extreme temperatures of globalwarming aremagnified in cities due to the urban heat island effect. Even if the target for average temperature increase in the Paris Climate Agreement is met, temperatures during the hottest month in a northern city like Oslo are predicted to rise by over 5 degrees C by 2050. We hypothesised that heat-related diagnoses for heat-sensitive citizens (75+) in Oslo are correlated to monthly air temperatures, and that green infrastructure such as tree canopy cover reduces extreme land surface temperatures and thus reduces health risk from heat exposure. Monthly air temperatures were significantly correlated to the number of skin-related diagnoses at the city level, but were unrelated to diagnoses under circulatory, nervous system, or general categories. Satellite-derived spatially-explicit measures revealed that on one of the hottest days during the summer of 2018, landscape units composed of paved, midrise or lowrise buildings gave off the most heat (39 degrees C), whereas units composed of complete tree canopy cover, ormixed (i.e. tree and grass) vegetation maintained temperatures of between 29 and 32 degrees C. Land surface temperatureswere negatively correlated to tree canopy cover (R-2= 0.45) and vegetation greenness (R-2= 0.41). In a scenario inwhich each city tree was replaced by the most common non-tree cover in its neighbourhood, the area of Oslo exceeding a 30 degrees C health risk threshold during the summerwould increase from 23 to 29%. Combining modelling results with population at risk at census tract level, we estimated that each tree in the city currently mitigates additional heat exposure of one heatsensitive person by one day. Our results indicate that maintaining and restoring tree cover provides an ecosystem service of urban heat reduction. Our findings have particular relevance for health benefit estimation in urban ecosystem accounting and municipal policy decisions regarding ecosystem-based climate adaptation. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban heat island mitigation by green infrastructure in European Functional Urban Areas
    Marando, Federica
    Heris, Mehdi P.
    Zulian, Grazia
    Udias, Angel
    Mentaschi, Lorenzo
    Chrysoulakis, Nektarios
    Parastatidis, David
    Maes, Joachim
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 77
  • [2] Green Infrastructure as an Urban Heat Island Mitigation Strategy-A Review
    Balany, Fatma
    Ng, Anne W. M.
    Muttil, Nitin
    Muthukumaran, Shobha
    Wong, Man Sing
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [3] The use of green infrastructure and irrigation in the mitigation of urban heat in a desert city
    Kai Gao
    Shamila Haddad
    Riccardo Paolini
    Jie Feng
    Muzahim Altheeb
    Abdulrahman Al Mogirah
    Abdullatif Bin Moammar
    Mattheos Santamouris
    [J]. Building Simulation, 2024, 17 : 679 - 694
  • [4] The use of green infrastructure and irrigation in the mitigation of urban heat in a desert city
    Gao, Kai
    Haddad, Shamila
    Paolini, Riccardo
    Feng, Jie
    Altheeb, Muzahim
    Al Mogirah, Abdulrahman
    Moammar, Abdullatif Bin
    Santamouris, Mattheos
    [J]. BUILDING SIMULATION, 2024, 17 (05) : 679 - 694
  • [5] Urban heat mitigation by green and blue infrastructure: Drivers, effectiveness, and future needs
    Kumar, Prashant
    Debele, Sisay E.
    Khalili, Soheila
    Halios, Christos H.
    Sahani, Jeetendra
    Aghamohammadi, Nasrin
    Andrade, Maria de Fatima
    Athanassiadou, Maria
    Bhui, Kamaldeep
    Calvillo, Nerea
    Cao, Shi-Jie
    Coulon, Frederic
    Edmondson, Jill L.
    Fletcher, David
    de Freitas, Edmilson Dias
    Guo, Hai
    Hort, Matthew C.
    Katti, Madhusudan
    Kjeldsen, Thomas Rodding
    Lehmann, Steffen
    Locosselli, Giuliano Maselli
    Malham, Shelagh K.
    Morawska, Lidia
    Parajuli, Rajan
    Rogers, Christopher D. F.
    Yao, Runming
    Wang, Fang
    Wenk, Jannis
    Jones, Laurence
    [J]. INNOVATION, 2024, 5 (02):
  • [6] Modeling the Normalized Urban Heat Island for the City of Karlsruhe by Linking Urban Morphology and Green Infrastructure
    Gangwisch, Marcel
    Ludwig, Svenja
    Matzarakis, Andreas
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [7] Investing in Urban Blue-Green Infrastructure-Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Stormwater Management in a Peri-Urban Catchment in Oslo, Norway
    Wilbers, Gert-Jan
    de Bruin, Karianne
    Seifert-Daehnn, Isabel
    Lekkerkerk, Wiebe
    Li, Hong
    Budding-Polo Ballinas, Monserrat
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [8] The Effect of Urban Green Infrastructure on Disaster Mitigation in Korea
    Kim, So Yoon
    Kim, Brian H. S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (06)
  • [9] Planning for cooler cities in Ghana: Contribution of green infrastructure to urban heat mitigation in Kumasi Metropolis
    Sarfo, Isaac
    Bi, Shuoben
    Xu, Xiuhua
    Yeboah, Emmanuel
    Kwang, Clement
    Batame, Michael
    Addai, Foster Kofi
    Adamu, Umar Wakil
    Appea, Emmanuella Aboagye
    Djan, Michael Atuahene
    Otchwemah, Henry Bortey
    Kudoh, Vanessa Elikem
    Vuguziga, Floribert
    Samuel, Olumide
    Koku, John Ernest
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 133
  • [10] Urban Green Infrastructure as a tool for urban heat mitigation: Survey of research methodologies and findings across different climatic regions
    Saaroni, H.
    Amorim, J. H.
    Hiemstra, J. A.
    Pearlmutter, D.
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2018, 24 : 94 - 110