Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

被引：213

作者：

Peters, Micah D. J. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Marnie, Casey ^{[1
]}

Colquhoun, Heather ^{[4
,5
]}

Garritty, Chantelle M. ^{[6
]}

Hempel, Susanne ^{[7
]}

Horsley, Tanya ^{[8
]}

Langlois, Etienne V. ^{[9
]}

Lillie, Erin ^{[10
]}

O'Brien, Kelly K. ^{[5
,11
,12
]}

Tuncalp, Ozge ^{[13
]}

Wilson, Michael G. ^{[14
,15
,16
]}

Zarin, Wasifa ^{[17
]}

Tricco, Andrea C. ^{[17
,18
,19
,20
]}

机构：

[1] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, UniSA Clin & Hlth Sci, Playford Bldg P4-27,City East Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia

[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, 101 Currie St, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

[3] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Ctr Evidence Based Practice South Australia CEPSA, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia

[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Terrence Donnelly Hlth Sci Complex, 3359 Mississauga Rd, Toronto, ON L5L IC6, Canada

[5] Univ Toronto, Rehabil Sci Inst RSI, St George Campus,160-500 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G IV7, Canada

[6] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Knowledge Synth Grp, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada

[7] Univ Southern Calif, Southern Calif Evidence Review Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA

[8] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, 774 Echo Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5N8, Canada

[9] WHO, Partnership Maternal Newborn & Child Hlth PMNCH, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

[10] Sunnybrook Res Inst, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

[11] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, St George Campus,160-500 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G IV7, Canada

[12] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat IHPME, St George Campus,155 Coll St,4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada

[13] WHO, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programm, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

[14] McMaster Univ, McMaster Hlth Forum, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada

[15] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Evidence & Impact, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada

[16] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada

[17] St Michaels Hosp, Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Knowledge Translat Program, 209 Victoria St,East Bldg, Toronto, ON M5B1T8, Canada

[18] Univ Toronto, Epidemiol Div, 155 Coll St,Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada

[19] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St,Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada

[20] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing, Queens Collaborat Hlth Care Qual Joanna Briggs In, 99 Univ Ave, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

来源：

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2021年 / 10卷 / 01期

关键词：

Scoping reviews; Evidence synthesis; Research methodology; Reporting guidelines; Methodological guidance; GUIDANCE; CONDUCT; FAMILY;

D O I：

10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to evidence synthesis with a growing suite of methodological guidance and resources to assist review authors with their planning, conduct and reporting. The latest guidance for scoping reviews includes the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews. This paper provides readers with a brief update regarding ongoing work to enhance and improve the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews as well as information regarding the future steps in scoping review methods development. The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with a concise source of information regarding the difference between scoping reviews and other review types, the reasons for undertaking scoping reviews, and an update on methodological guidance for the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. Despite available guidance, some publications use the term 'scoping review' without clear consideration of available reporting and methodological tools. Selection of the most appropriate review type for the stated research objectives or questions, standardised use of methodological approaches and terminology in scoping reviews, clarity and consistency of reporting and ensuring that the reporting and presentation of the results clearly addresses the review's objective(s) and question(s) are critical components for improving the rigour of scoping reviews. Rigourous, high-quality scoping reviews should clearly follow up to date methodological guidance and reporting criteria. Stakeholder engagement is one area where further work could occur to enhance integration of consultation with the results of evidence syntheses and to support effective knowledge translation. Scoping review methodology is evolving as a policy and decision-making tool. Ensuring the integrity of scoping reviews by adherence to up-to-date reporting standards is integral to supporting well-informed decision-making.

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
Micah D. J. Peters
Casey Marnie
Heather Colquhoun
Chantelle M. Garritty
Susanne Hempel
Tanya Horsley
Etienne V. Langlois
Erin Lillie
Kelly K. O’Brien
Ӧzge Tunçalp
Michael G. Wilson
Wasifa Zarin
Andrea C. Tricco
[J]. Systematic Reviews, 10
[2] Advancing the methodology of mapping reviews: A scoping review
Khalil, Hanan
Campbell, Fiona
Danial, Katrina
Pollock, Danielle
Munn, Zachary
Welsh, Vivian
Saran, Ashrita
Hoppe, Dimi
Tricco, Andrea C.
[J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (03) : 384 - 397
[3] An Indigenous-informed scoping review study methodology: advancing the science of scoping reviews
Phillips-Beck, Wanda
Bukich, Bryden L. J.
Thiessen, Kellie
Lavoie, Josee G.
Schultz, Annette
Sanguins, Julianne
Beck, Geraldine
Longclaws, Brenda
Shingoose, Geraldine
Palmer, Matta
Linton, Janice
Negash, Bekelu
Morriseau, Taylor
[J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
[4] Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
Levac, Danielle
Colquhoun, Heather
O'Brien, Kelly K.
[J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
[5] Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
Danielle Levac
Heather Colquhoun
Kelly K O'Brien
[J]. Implementation Science, 5
[6] The Evolving Methodology of Scoping Reviews
Cacchione, Pamela Z.
[J]. CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (02) : 115 - 119
[7] A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
Pham, Mai T.
Rajic, Andrijana
Greig, Judy D.
Sargeant, Jan M.
Papadopoulos, Andrew
McEwen, Scott A.
[J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (04) : 371 - 385
[8] Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services
Anderson, Joanna K.
Howarth, Emma
Vainre, Maris
Humphrey, Ayla
Jones, Peter B.
Ford, Tamsin J.
[J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[9] Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services
Joanna K. Anderson
Emma Howarth
Maris Vainre
Ayla Humphrey
Peter B. Jones
Tamsin J. Ford
[J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
[10] Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users
Khalil, Hanan
Bennett, Marsha
Godfrey, Christina
McInerney, Patricia
Munn, Zac
Peters, Micah
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2020, 18 (01) : 95 - 100

← 1 2 3 4 5 →