Flight Performance Assessment of Land Surveying Trajectories for Multiple UAV Platforms

被引:0
|
作者
Mora, Andres [1 ]
Vemprala, Sai [1 ]
Carrio, Adrian [1 ,2 ]
Saripalli, Srikanth [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Earth & Space Explorat, 781 E Terrace Rd, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] CSIC UPM, Ctr Automat & Robot, Comp Vis Grp, Madrid, Spain
关键词
COVERAGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Crop monitoring of large areas using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) is a process that involves multiple tradeoffs. For a particular location a multicopter may be more suitable than a fixed-wing due to landscape, altitude, or weather conditions. In other cases the opposite may also be true and the best solution considering additional factors such as available energy and the time it takes to sample the area of interest. In this paper we evaluate the energy consumption, the total distance traveled, and the total time it takes for two unmanned aerial platforms, a fixed-wing and a multicopter to traverse different trajectories. We evaluate the performance of these two platforms using two trajectories: lawnmower and spiral. These trajectories guarantee a 60% both in overlap and sidelap. We analyze the trade-offs between traversing a given trajectory with both platforms and the impact of using a lawnmower instead of a spiral pattern in the context of precision agriculture applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land surveying with UAV photogrammetry and LiDAR for optimal building planning
    Sestras, Paul
    Badea, Gheorghe
    Badea, Ana Cornelia
    Salagean, Tudor
    Rosca, Sanda
    Kader, Shuraik
    Remondino, Fabio
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 173
  • [2] Accuracy Assessment of UAV LiDAR Compared to Traditional Total Station for Geospatial Data Collection in Land Surveying Contexts
    Tamimi, Rami
    Toth, Charles
    MID-TERM SYMPOSIUM THE ROLE OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, VOL. 48-2, 2024, : 421 - 426
  • [3] Automated multiple UAV flight - the Stanford DragonFly UAV program
    Teo, R
    Jang, JS
    Tomlin, CJ
    2004 43RD IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), VOLS 1-5, 2004, : 4268 - 4273
  • [4] Determining free flight performance by surveying engineering techniques
    Teskey, WF
    Adler, DH
    Teskey, WJ
    JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2006, 132 (02): : 93 - 96
  • [5] Performance Synthesis of UAV Trajectories in Multistatic SAR
    Coker, Jonathan D.
    Tewfik, Ahmed H.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 47 (02) : 848 - 863
  • [6] Force Field-Based Indirect Manipulation Of UAV Flight Trajectories
    Isop, Werner Alexander
    Fraundorfer, Friedrich
    2019 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2019, : 2775 - 2782
  • [7] A novel multiple target tracking system for UAV platforms
    Yi, Steven
    Zhang, Libin
    AIRBORNE INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, RECONNAISSANCE (ISR) SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS III, 2006, 6209
  • [8] Developing of WIMP Interfaces on Critical Platforms for Automatic Flight Control System of UAV
    Prosvirin, D. A.
    Kharchenko, V. P.
    2017 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES DEVELOPMENTS (APUAVD), 2017, : 112 - 115
  • [9] Flight Test of Flight Control Performance for Airplane Mode of Smart UAV
    Kang, Young-shin
    Park, Bum-jin
    Cho, Am
    Yoo, Chang-sun
    Koo, Sam-Ok
    2012 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS (ICCAS), 2012, : 1738 - 1741
  • [10] Characterisation of football trajectories for assessing flight performance
    Ward, Matthew
    Passmore, Martin
    Spencer, Adrian
    Tuplin, Simon
    Harland, Andy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART P-JOURNAL OF SPORTS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 233 (01) : 16 - 26