The influence of different anticoagulants and time-delayed sample processing and measurements on human monocyte subset and monocyte-platelet aggregate analyses

被引:7
|
作者
Ji, Wen-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Rui-Yi [1 ]
Liu, Jun-Xiang [1 ]
Ma, Yong-Qiang [1 ]
Zeng, Shan [1 ]
Shi, Rui [1 ]
Zhao, Ji-Hong [1 ]
Chen, Shao-Bo [1 ]
Zhou, Xin [1 ]
Li, Yu-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Pingjin Hosp, Tianjin Key Lab Cardiovasc Remodeling & Target Or, Heart Ctr, 220,Cheng Lin St, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Pingjin Hosp, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
monocyte subsets; monocyte-platelet aggregates; platelet-monocyte aggregates; anticoagulation; sample preparation; flow cytometry; CD14(++)CD16(+) MONOCYTES; P-SELECTIN; IN-VIVO; MARKER;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.b.21363
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundMeasuring human monocyte subsets (CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, and CD14+CD16++) and subset-specific monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPA) is vulnerable to analytical bias due to unavailability of a standardized methodology. We aimed to address this issue by focusing on the impacts of time-delayed sample processing and measurement between two commonly used anticoagulants. MethodsEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)- and sodium citrate (SC)-anticoagulated blood samples from 12 healthy donors were subject to either delayed (2-h delay, kept at 4 degrees C) or immediate processing (without fixation) before four-color flow cytometry (FCM) analysis. ResultsIn SC-anticoagulated samples, a 2-h delay in sample processing contributed to a significant decrease in CD14++CD16- monocyte percent and a reciprocal increase in CD14++CD16+ monocytes, as well as increases in all three subset-specific MPA. Similar slight, but non-significant changes were observed in EDTA-treated samples. In samples processed immediately and stored at 4 degrees C, delayed measurement at 0, 1, 3, and 5 h after processing led to a time-dependent decrease in CD14++CD16- monocyte percent and a reciprocal increase in CD14++CD16+ subset in SC-treated, but not in EDTA-treated, samples. Moreover, a time-dependent increase in all three subset-specific MPA was observed in SC-treated samples, which, to a lesser extent, was only observed in CD14++CD16+ MPA in EDTA-treated samples after storage at 4 degrees C for 3-5 h after processing. ConclusionsWe recommend EDTA for anticoagulation. Additionally, sample should be stored at 4 degrees C and processing and measuring should be performed within 2 h after harvest and 3 h after processing, respectively. (c) 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 379
页数:9
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Influence of different anticoagulants on monocyte procoagulant functions and monocyte-platelet aggregates formation
    Basavaraj, M. G.
    Osterud, B.
    Hansen, J. -B.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2012, 10 (08) : 1698 - 1702
  • [2] INFLUENCE OF 5 DIFFERENT ANTICOAGULANTS ON HUMAN-BLOOD MONOCYTE ISOLATION AND FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES
    NIELSEN, H
    ACTA PATHOLOGICA MICROBIOLOGICA ET IMMUNOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA SECTION C-IMMUNOLOGY, 1985, 93 (02): : 49 - 52
  • [3] Monocyte CD163 and CD36 expression in human whole blood and isolated mononuclear cell samples: Influence of different anticoagulants
    Moniuszko, Marcin
    Kowal, Krzysztof
    Rusak, Malgorzata
    Pietruczuk, Miroslawa
    Dabrowska, Milena
    Bodzenta-Lukaszyk, Anna
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (06) : 704 - 707