Serological responses and vaccine effectiveness for extended COVID-19 vaccine schedules in England

被引:72
|
作者
Amirthalingam, Gayatri [1 ]
Bernal, Jamie Lopez [1 ]
Andrews, Nick J. [1 ]
Whitaker, Heather [2 ]
Gower, Charlotte [1 ]
Stowe, Julia [1 ]
Tessier, Elise [1 ]
Subbarao, Sathyavani [1 ]
Ireland, Georgina [1 ]
Baawuah, Frances [1 ,3 ]
Linley, Ezra [4 ]
Warrener, Lenesha [5 ]
O'Brien, Michelle [3 ]
Whillock, Corinne [1 ]
Moss, Paul [6 ]
Ladhani, Shamez N. [1 ,7 ]
Brown, Kevin E. [1 ]
Ramsay, Mary E. [1 ]
机构
[1] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Immunisat & Vaccine Preventable Dis Div, London, England
[2] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Stat Modelling & Econ Dept, London, England
[3] Brondesbury Med Ctr, London, England
[4] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Sero Epidemiolgy Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Virus Reference Dept, London, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Inst Immunol & Immunotherapy, Edgbaston, England
[7] St Georges Univ London, Paediat Infect Dis Res Grp, London, England
关键词
ANTIBODY;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-021-27410-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The UK extended the interval until the second COVID-19 vaccine dose up to 12 weeks. Here, the authors show in a cohort of 750 participants aged 50-89 years that the extended schedule results in higher antibody titers and estimate a higher vaccine effectiveness for the extended schedule. The UK prioritised delivery of the first dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca) vaccines by extending the interval between doses up to 12 weeks. In 750 participants aged 50-89 years, we here compare serological responses after BNT162b2 and AZD1222 vaccination with varying dose intervals, and evaluate these against real-world national vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates against COVID-19 in England. We show that antibody levels 14-35 days after dose two are higher in BNT162b2 recipients with an extended vaccine interval (65-84 days) compared with those vaccinated with a standard (19-29 days) interval. Following the extended schedule, antibody levels were 6-fold higher at 14-35 days post dose 2 for BNT162b2 than AZD1222. For both vaccines, VE was higher across all age-groups from 14 days after dose two compared to one dose, but the magnitude varied with dose interval. Higher dose two VE was observed with >6 week interval between BNT162b2 doses compared to the standard schedule. Our findings suggest higher effectiveness against infection using an extended vaccine schedule. Given global vaccine constraints these results are relevant to policymakers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Serological responses and vaccine effectiveness for extended COVID-19 vaccine schedules in England
    Gayatri Amirthalingam
    Jamie Lopez Bernal
    Nick J. Andrews
    Heather Whitaker
    Charlotte Gower
    Julia Stowe
    Elise Tessier
    Sathyavani Subbarao
    Georgina Ireland
    Frances Baawuah
    Ezra Linley
    Lenesha Warrener
    Michelle O’Brien
    Corinne Whillock
    Paul Moss
    Shamez N. Ladhani
    Kevin E. Brown
    Mary E. Ramsay
    [J]. Nature Communications, 12
  • [2] Author Correction: Serological responses and vaccine effectiveness for extended COVID-19 vaccine schedules in England
    Gayatri Amirthalingam
    Jamie Lopez Bernal
    Nick J. Andrews
    Heather Whitaker
    Charlotte Gower
    Julia Stowe
    Elise Tessier
    Sathyavani Subbarao
    Georgina Ireland
    Frances Baawuah
    Ezra Linley
    Lenesha Warrener
    Michelle O’Brien
    Corinne Whillock
    Paul Moss
    Shamez N. Ladhani
    Kevin E. Brown
    Mary E. Ramsay
    [J]. Nature Communications, 13
  • [3] Serological responses and vaccine effectiveness for extended COVID-19 vaccine schedules in England (vol 12, 7217, 2021)
    Amirthalingam, Gayatri
    Bernal, Jamie Lopez
    Andrews, Nick J.
    Whitaker, Heather
    Gower, Charlotte
    Stowe, Julia
    Tessier, Elise
    Subbarao, Sathyavani
    Ireland, Georgina
    Baawuah, Frances
    Linley, Ezra
    Warrener, Lenesha
    O'Brien, Michelle
    Whillock, Corinne
    Moss, Paul
    Ladhani, Shamez N.
    Brown, Kevin E.
    Ramsay, Mary E.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [4] COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness
    Shader, Richard I.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 43 (06) : 1132 - 1133
  • [5] SEROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATIVE TO AUGMENT THE COVID-19 VACCINE IMMUNE RESPONSE
    Martinez, E.
    Loveless, B.
    Crone, P.
    Szurmant, H.
    Fuchs, S.
    Sanchez, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 71 (01) : NP41 - NP41
  • [6] Extended reporting guidance for vaccine effectiveness studies for variants of concern for COVID-19
    Linkins, Lori-Ann
    Iorio, Alfonso
    Little, Julian
    Lavis, John
    [J]. VACCINE, 2022, 40 (22) : 2986 - 2987
  • [8] COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Adolescents
    Poukka, Eero
    Andersson, Niklas Worm
    Thiesson, Emilia Myrup
    Baum, Ulrike
    Pihlstrom, Nicklas
    Perala, Jori
    Kristoffersen, Anja Brathen
    Meijerink, Hinta
    Starrfelt, Jostein
    Ljung, Rickard
    Hviid, Anders
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2024, 153 (02)
  • [9] Waning COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in Japan
    Kurita, Junko
    Sugawara, Tamie
    Ohkusa, Yasushi
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERIES AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 16 (01): : 30 - 36
  • [10] The effect of HIV on COVID-19 vaccine responses
    Levy, Itzchak
    Rahav, Galia
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS, 2023, 18 (03) : 135 - 141