Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis in the Indian health system: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Tiwari, Anuj [1 ]
Blok, David J. [1 ]
Arif, Mohammad [2 ]
Richardus, Jan Hendrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] NLR India, New Delhi, India
来源
PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES | 2020年 / 14卷 / 08期
关键词
RIFAMPICIN; CONTACTS; DISEASE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pntd.0008521
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Author summary Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by theMycobacterium lepraeand is one of the major causes of preventable disability in low- and middle-income countries. Disabled people face lifelong socioeconomic challenges and are often excluded from society. It brings people affected by leprosy in a vicious cycle of poverty and disability. This cycle needs to be curbed through scientific evidence on health economic aspects of leprosy. Unfortunately, there is not much literature available on cost or cost-effectiveness of leprosy prevention. New prevention methods such as post-exposure chemoprophylaxis are now available, providing opportunity to collect up-to-date health economic evidence to support health policy and planning. Here, we present a cost-effectiveness study of contact screening in combination of post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin in the Union Territory of Dadra Nagar Haveli in India. We compare the intervention with the continuation of the routine leprosy control programme. As leprosy is moving towards elimination, evidence from this study will contribute to an investment case for leprosy elimination. India has the highest burden of leprosy in the world. Following a recent WHO guideline, the Indian National Leprosy Programme is introducing post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin (SDR-PEP) in all high-endemic districts of the country. The aim of this study is to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of SDR-PEP in different leprosy disability burden situations. We used a stochastic individual-based model (SIMCOLEP) to simulate the leprosy new case detection rate trend and the impact of implementing contact screening and SDR-PEP from 2016 to 2040 (25 years) in the Union Territory of Dadra Nagar Haveli (DNH) in India. Effects of the intervention were expressed as disability adjusted life years (DALY) averted under three assumption of disability prevention: 1) all grade 1 disability (G1D) cases prevented; 2) G1D cases prevented in PB cases only; 3) no disability prevented. Costs were US$ 2.9 per contact. Costs and effects were discounted at 3%. The incremental cost per DALY averted by SDR-PEP was US$ 210, US$ 447, and US$ 5,673 in the 25(th)year under assumption 1, 2, and 3, respectively. If prevention of G1D was assumed, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 1.0 at the threshold of US$ 2,000, which is equivalent to the GDP per capita of India. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.6, if no disability prevention was assumed. The cost per new leprosy case averted was US$ 2,873. Contact listing, screening and the provision of SDR-PEP is a cost-effective strategy in leprosy control in both the short (5 years) and long term (25 years). The cost-effectiveness depends on the extent to which disability can be prevented. As the intervention becomes increasingly cost-effective in the long term, we recommend a long-term commitment for its implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VARICELLA VACCINE AS POST-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    Chui, K. S.
    Wu, H. L.
    You, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A357 - A357
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in France
    Herida, Magid
    Larsen, Christine
    Lot, Florence
    Laporte, Anne
    Desenclos, Jean-Claude
    Hamers, Francoise F.
    [J]. AIDS, 2006, 20 (13) : 1753 - 1761
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure to HIV
    Pinkerton, SD
    Holtgrave, DR
    Bloom, FR
    [J]. AIDS, 1998, 12 (09) : 1067 - 1078
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of HIV nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis in Australia
    Guinot, D.
    Ho, M. T.
    Poynten, I. M.
    McAllister, J.
    Pierce, A.
    Pell, C.
    Grulich, A. E.
    [J]. HIV MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (04) : 199 - 208
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness analysis of varicella vaccine as post-exposure prophylaxis in Hong Kong
    Chui, Ka-Sing
    Wu, Hiu-Lok
    You, Joyce H. S.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 46 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [6] Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis: A case study in Tanzania
    Shim, Eunha
    Hampson, Katie
    Cleaveland, Sarah
    Galvani, Alison P.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2009, 27 (51) : 7167 - 7172
  • [7] Post-exposure influenza prophylaxis with oseltamivir: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility in families in the UK
    Sander, B
    Gyldmark, M
    Bergemann, R
    Garrison, L
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (06) : 750 - 750
  • [8] Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis: innovation and precision public health
    Moraes, Milton Ozorio
    Dueppre, Nadia Cristina
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 9 (01): : E8 - E9
  • [9] LEPROSY POST-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS: AN OPTION TO ACCELERATE LEPROSY ELIMINATION
    Blok, David J.
    Cavaliero, Arielle
    Steinmann, Peter
    Richardus, Jan Hendrik
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2019, 101 : 613 - 613
  • [10] The Leprosy Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (LPEP) programme: update and interim analysis
    Steinmann, Peter
    Cavaliero, Arielle
    Aerts, Ann
    Anand, Sunil
    Arif, Mohammad
    Ay, Sarady Sao
    Aye, Tin Maung
    Barth-Jaeggi, Tanja
    Banstola, Nand Lal
    Bhandari, Chuda Mani
    Blaney, David
    Bonenberger, Marc
    Van Brakel, Wim
    Cross, Hugh
    Das, V. K.
    Fahrudda, Ansarul
    Fernando, Nilanthi
    Gani, Zaahira
    Greter, Helena
    Ignotti, Eliane
    Kamara, Deus
    Kasang, Christa
    Koemm, Burkard
    Kumar, Anil
    Lay, Sambath
    Mieras, Liesbeth
    Mirza, Fareed
    Mutayoba, Beatrice
    Njako, Blasdus
    Pakasi, Tiara
    Saunderson, Paul
    Shengelia, Bakhuti
    Smith, Cairns S.
    Staeheli, Rene
    Suriyarachchi, Nayani
    Shwe, Tin
    Tiwari, Anuj
    Supun, Millawage
    Wijesinghe, D.
    Van Berkeli, Jan
    Plaetse, Bart Vander
    Virmond, Marcos
    Richardus, Jan Hendrik
    [J]. LEPROSY REVIEW, 2018, 89 (02) : 102 - 116