Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter: Vocal versus nonvocal performance differences

被引:40
|
作者
Byrd, Courtney T. [1 ]
McGill, Megann [2 ]
Usler, Evan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Phonological working memory; Nonword repetition; Phoneme elision; Adults who stutter; YOUNG-CHILDREN; PHONOTACTIC PROBABILITY; WORKING-MEMORY; LANGUAGE; ABILITIES; SPEECH; DISORDERS; FREQUENCY; WORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to enhance our understanding of phonological working memory in adults who stutter through the comparison of nonvocal versus vocal nonword repetition and phoneme elision task performance differences. Method: For the vocal nonword repetition condition, participants repeated sets of 4- and 7-syllable nonwords (n = 12 per set). For the nonvocal nonword repetition condition, participants silently identified each target nonword from a subsequent set of three nonwords. For the vocal phoneme elision condition, participants repeated nonwords with a target phoneme eliminated. For the nonvocal phoneme elision condition, participants silently identified the nonword with the designated target phoneme eliminated from a subsequent set of three nonwords. Results: Adults who stutter produced significantly fewer accurate initial productions of 7-syllable nonwords compared to adults who do not stutter. There were no talker group differences for the silent identification of nonwords, but both talker groups required significantly more mean number of attempts to accurately silently identify 7-syllable as compared to 4-syllable nonwords. For the vocal phoneme elision condition, adults who stutter were significantly less accurate than adults who do not stutter in their initial production and required a significantly higher mean number of attempts to accurately produce 7-syllable nonwords with a phoneme eliminated. This talker group difference was also significant for the nonvocal phoneme elision condition for both 4- and 7-syllable nonwords. Conclusion: Present findings suggest phonological working memory may contribute to the difficulties persons who stutter have establishing and/or maintaining fluent speech. Educational Objectives: (a) Readers can describe the role of phonological working memory in planning for and execution of speech; (b) readers can describe two experimental tasks for exploring the phonological working memory: nonword repetition and phoneme elision; (c) readers can describe how the nonword repetition and phoneme elision skills of adults who stutter differ from their typically fluent peers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 31
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    Vallely, Megann
    Anderson, Julie D.
    Sussman, Harvey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2012, 37 (03) : 188 - 201
  • [2] Nonword repetition and phoneme elision skills in school-age children who do and do not stutter
    Sasisekaran, Jayanthi
    Byrd, Courtney
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2013, 48 (06) : 625 - 639
  • [3] Nonword repetition and nonword reading abilities in adults who do and do not stutter
    Sasisekaran, Jayanthi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2013, 38 (03) : 275 - 289
  • [4] Nonword repetition skills in young children who do and do not stutter
    Anderson, Julie D.
    Wagovich, Stacy A.
    Hall, Nancy E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2006, 31 (03) : 177 - 199
  • [5] Delayed silent phoneme monitoring in adults who do and do not stutter
    Coalson, Geoffrey A.
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    [J]. SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING, 2020, 23 (02) : 37 - 54
  • [6] Nonword repetition and identification skills in Kannada speaking school-aged children who do and do not stutter
    Sugathan, Nirmal
    Maruthy, Santosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2020, 63
  • [7] Bimanual task performance: Adults who do and do not stutter
    Werle, Danielle
    Byrd, Courtney
    Gkalitsiou, Zoi
    Eggers, Kurt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2019, 81
  • [8] Use of a phoneme monitoring task to examine lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter
    Howell, Timothy A.
    Ratner, Nan Bernstein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2018, 57 : 65 - 73
  • [9] Differences in implicit motor learning between adults who do and do not stutter
    Hobler, Fiona
    Bitan, Tali
    Tremblay, Luc
    De Nil, Luc
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2022, 174
  • [10] Metrical Encoding in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter
    Coalson, Geoffrey A.
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (03): : 601 - 621