Automated Calculation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Parameters in Clinical Cone-Beam CT

被引:5
|
作者
Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keith, Jason P. [4 ]
Hittle, Brad [4 ]
Riggs, William J. [2 ]
Adunka, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
Wiet, Gregory J. [1 ,2 ]
Powell, Kimerly A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Cochlear implantation; Image-guided programming; Otology; Patient-specific adaptation; Segmentation; SEGMENTATION; LOCALIZATION; CONTOUR;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000003432
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: Automated processing of postoperative clinical cone-beam CT (CBCT) of cochlear implant (CI) patients can be used to accurately determine electrode contacts and integrated with an atlas-based mapping of cochlear micro-structures to calculate modiolar distance, angular insertion distance, and scalar location of electrode contacts. Background: Hearing outcomes after CI surgery are dependent on electrode placement. CBCT is increasingly used for in-office temporal bone imaging and might be routinely used for pre- and post-surgical evaluation. Methods: Thirty-six matched pairs of pre- and postimplant CBCT scans were obtained. These were registered with an atlas to model cochlear microstructures in each dataset. Electrode contact center points were automatically determined using thresholding and electrode insertion parameters were calculated. Automated localization and calculation were compared with manual segmentation of contact center points as well as manufacturer specifications. Results: Automated electrode contact detection aligned with manufacturer specifications of spacing and our algorithms worked for both distantly- and closely spaced arrays. The average difference between the manual and the automated selection was 0.15mm, corresponding to a 1.875 voxel difference in each plane at the scan resolution. For each case, we determined modiolar distance, angular insertion depth, and scalar location. These calculations also resulted in similar insertion values using manual and automated contact points as well as aligning with electrode properties. Conclusion: Automated processing of implanted high-resolution CBCT images can provide the clinician with key information on electrode placement. This is one step toward routine use of clinical CBCT after CI surgery to inform and guide postoperative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 205
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiohistologic Comparison Study of Temporal Bone Specimens After Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion: Is Cone-Beam CT Superior to MDCT?
    Burck, Iris
    Schneider, Serena, V
    Balster, Sven
    Lehn, Annette
    Yel, Ibrahim
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Helbig, Silke
    Stoever, Timo
    Kaltenbach, Benjamin
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (03) : 752 - 758
  • [2] Optimising the parameters of cochlear implant imaging with cone-beam computed tomography
    Soederqvist, Samuel
    Sivonen, Ville
    Aarnisalo, Antti
    Karppi, Harri
    Sinkkonen, Saku T.
    Koivisto, Juha
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2023, 199 (05) : 462 - 470
  • [3] Automated implant segmentation in cone-beam CT using edge detection and particle counting
    Ruben Pauwels
    Reinhilde Jacobs
    Hilde Bosmans
    Pisha Pittayapat
    Pasupen Kosalagood
    Onanong Silkosessak
    Soontra Panmekiate
    [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2014, 9 : 733 - 743
  • [4] Automated implant segmentation in cone-beam CT using edge detection and particle counting
    Pauwels, Ruben
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    Bosmans, Hilde
    Pittayapat, Pisha
    Kosalagood, Pasupen
    Silkosessak, Onanong
    Panmekiate, Soontra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2014, 9 (04) : 733 - 743
  • [5] Clinical implementation of a cone-beam CT
    Betgen, A
    van Herk, M
    Remeijer, P
    Sonke, JJ
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S158 - S158
  • [6] The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Determine Cochlear Implant Electrode Position in Human Temporal Bones
    Saeed, Shakeel R.
    Selvadurai, David
    Beale, Tim
    Biggs, Nigel
    Murray, Brendan
    Gibson, Peter
    Risi, Frank
    Boyd, Paul
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (08) : 1338 - 1344
  • [7] Automated Daily Cone-Beam CT Quality Control
    Pearson, E.
    Becker, N.
    Moseley, D.
    Jaffray, D.
    Tadic, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3283 - 3283
  • [8] Evaluation of Dose Calculation Based On Cone-Beam CT
    Abe, T.
    Tateoka, K.
    Fujimoto, K.
    Nakazawa, T.
    Saitou, Y.
    Nakata, A.
    Yano, M.
    Sakata, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 259 - 259
  • [9] Dose calculation using megavoltage cone-beam CT
    Morin, Olivier
    Chen, Josephine
    Aubin, Michele
    Gillis, Amy
    Aubry, Jean-Francois
    Bose, Supratik
    Chen, Hong
    Descovich, Martina
    Xia, Ping
    Pouliot, Jean
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (04): : 1201 - 1210
  • [10] Automated CNN-Based Tooth Segmentation in Cone-Beam CT for Dental Implant Planning
    Lee, S.
    Woo, S.
    Yu, J.
    Seo, J.
    Lee, J.
    Lee, C.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 50507 - 50518