Hydropower externalities: A meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Mattmann, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Logar, Ivana [1 ]
Brouwer, Roy [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Eawag, Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Dept Environm Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Econ, Water Inst, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
Hydropower; Renewable energy; Externalities; Non-market valuation; Meta-regression; Sensitivity to scope; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; WIND FARMS; ENERGY; SCOPE; PREFERENCES; ATTRIBUTES; SERVICES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2016.04.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a meta-analysis of existing research related to the economic valuation of the external effects of hydropower. A database consisting of 81 observations derived from 29 studies valuing the non-market impacts of hydropower electricity generation is constructed with the main aim to quantify and explain the economic values for positive and negative hydropower externalities. Different meta-regression model specifications are used to test the robustness of significant determinants of non-market values, including different types of hydropower impacts. The explanatory and predictive power of the estimated models is relatively high. Whilst controlling for sample and study characteristics, we find significant evidence for public aversion towards deteriorations of landscape, vegetation and wildlife caused by hydropower projects. There is however only weak evidence of willingness to pay for mitigating these effects. The main positive externality of hydropower generation, the avoidance of greenhouse gas emission, positively influences welfare estimates when combined with the share of hydropower in national energy production. Sensitivity to scope is detected, but not linked to specific externalities or non-market valuation methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 77
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis
    Mattmann, Matteo
    Logar, Ivana
    Brouwer, Roy
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 127 : 23 - 36
  • [2] The impacts of hydropower on freshwater macroinvertebrate richness: A global meta-analysis
    Trottier, Gabrielle
    Turgeon, Katrine
    Boisclair, Daniel
    Bulle, Cecile
    Margni, Manuele
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [3] Coal mining and policy responses: are externalities appropriately addressed? A meta-analysis
    Silvia, Ferrini
    Talia, Virna
    Di Matteo, Massimo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 126 : 39 - 47
  • [4] DYNAMIC EXTERNALITIES OF HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENT
    Fan, Qixiang
    Wang, Huiyan
    Li, Jia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2020, 21 (03): : 1136 - 1145
  • [5] An assessment of the socioeconomic externalities of hydropower plants in Brazil
    Sgarbi, Felipe de Albuquerque
    Uhlig, Alexandre
    Simoes, Andre Felipe
    Goldemberg, Jose
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 868 - 879
  • [6] The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalities
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Kim, Jinsoo
    Yang, Minyoung
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 72
  • [7] Meta-analysis of meta-analysis: Transparency matters
    Uttl, Bob
    Kisinger, Kelly
    Henry, Meaghen
    Odegard, Breanna
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2008, 62 (04): : 298 - 298
  • [8] Meta-analysis
    Yusuf, S
    Pogue, J
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 351 (9120): : 1960 - 1960
  • [9] Meta-analysis
    Hagger, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 15 (01) : 120 - 151
  • [10] The meta-analysis
    Quintanilha Ribeiro, Fernando de Andrade
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 83 (05) : 497 - 497