Joint Sampling Rate and Quantization Rate-Distortion Analysis in 5G Compressive Video Sensing

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Jin-xiu [1 ,2 ]
Esposito, Christian [3 ]
Jiang, Aimin [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Ning [4 ]
Kim, Pankoo [5 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Internet Things Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr World Water V, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Salerno, Dept Comp Sci, Salerno, Italy
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Chosun Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Gwangju, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY | 2020年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
Residual reconstraction compressed video sensing; Rate-distortion model; Quantitative parameters; Sampling rate;
D O I
10.3966/160792642020012101018
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Compressed video sensing (CVS) is one of the 5G application of compressed sensing (CS) to video coding. Block-based residual reconstruction is used in CVS to explore temporal redundancy in videos. However, most current studies on CVS focus on random measurements without quantization, and thus they are not suitable for practical applications. In this study, an efficient rate-control scheme combining measurement rate and quantization for residual reconstruction in CVS is proposed. The quantization effects on CS measurements and recovery for video signals are first analyzed. Based on this, a mathematical relationship between quantitative distortion (QD), sampling rate (SR), and the quantization parameter (QP) is derived. Moreover, a novel distortion model that exhibits the relationship between QD, SR, and QP is presented, if statistical independency between the QD and the CS reconstruction distortion is assumed. Then, using this model, a rate-distortion (RD) optimized rate allocation algorithm is proposed, whereby it is possible to derive the values of SR and QP that maximize visual quality according to the available channel bandwidth.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 216
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rate-distortion optimization for compressive video sampling
    Liu, Ying
    Vijayanagar, Krishna Rao
    Kim, Joohee
    [J]. COMPRESSIVE SENSING III, 2014, 9109
  • [2] The rate-distortion optimized quantization algorithm in Compressive Sensing
    Jiang, Wei
    Yang, Junjie
    [J]. OPTIK, 2014, 125 (15): : 3980 - 3985
  • [3] Rate-Distortion Optimized Distributed Compressive Video Sensing
    Xu, Jin
    Qiao, Yuansong
    Wen, Quan
    [J]. IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2016, E99A (06) : 1272 - 1276
  • [4] Rate-Distortion and Rate-Energy-Distortion Evaluations of Compressive-Sensing Video Coding
    [J]. Li, Ran (liran358@163.com), 1600, Hindawi Limited, 410 Park Avenue, 15th Floor, 287 pmb, New York, NY 10022, United States (2017):
  • [5] ON THE EMPIRICAL RATE-DISTORTION PERFORMANCE OF COMPRESSIVE SENSING
    Schulz, Adriana
    Velho, Luiz
    da Silva, Eduardo A. B.
    [J]. 2009 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 3049 - 3052
  • [6] Perceptual Distributed Compressive Video Sensing via Reweighted Sampling and Rate-Distortion Optimized Measurements Allocation
    Xu, Jin
    Zhang, Yan
    Fu, Zhizhong
    Zhou, Ning
    [J]. IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2017, E100D (04): : 918 - 922
  • [7] Rate-distortion analysis of structured sensing matrices for block compressive sensing of images
    Unde, Amit Satish
    Deepthi, P. P.
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2018, 65 : 115 - 127
  • [8] The Rate-Distortion Optimized Compressive Sensing for Image Coding
    Jiang, Wei
    Yang, Junjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 86 (01): : 85 - 97
  • [9] Analysis on Rate-distortion Performance of Compressive Sensing for Binary Sparse Source
    Wu, Feng
    Fu, Jingjing
    Lin, Zhouchen
    Zeng, Bing
    [J]. DCC 2009: 2009 DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 113 - +
  • [10] The Rate-Distortion Optimized Compressive Sensing for Image Coding
    Wei Jiang
    Junjie Yang
    [J]. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 2017, 86 : 85 - 97