Can Personality Explain the Educational Gradient in Divorce? Evidence From a Nationally Representative Panel Survey

被引:6
|
作者
Boertien, Diederik [1 ]
von Scheve, Christian [2 ]
Park, Mona [3 ]
机构
[1] European Univ Inst, Florence, Italy
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
关键词
divorce; family; inequality; personality; social stratification; education; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; ACADEMIC-SUCCESS; STABILITY; TRAITS; DISSOLUTION; ABILITY; SATISFACTION; EMPLOYMENT; VARIABLES; MARRIAGE;
D O I
10.1177/0192513X15585811
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The social demographic literature on divorce suggests that the lower educated are more likely to have personality traits that reduce relationship stability. However, few empirical verifications of this proposition exist. To fill this void, we look at the distribution of personality traits across educational groups of married individuals in Britain. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey (N = 2,665), we first estimated the effects of the Big Five personality traits agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience on divorce and subsequently examine their distribution across educational groups. We find that in particular women's personality traits differ by education. We also observe that personality traits affecting divorce risk are distributed unevenly over educational groups, but they do not favor the higher educated in general. In sum, the data do not support the hypothesis that the lower educated in Britain have personality traits that reduce relationship stability.
引用
收藏
页码:1339 / 1362
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disparities in Educational Access in the Time of COVID: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Panel of American Families
    Haderlein, Shira K.
    Saavedra, Anna Rosefsky
    Polikoff, Morgan S.
    Silver, Daniel
    Rapaport, Amie
    Garland, Marshall
    [J]. AERA OPEN, 2021, 7
  • [2] The entrepreneurial process: Evidence from a nationally representative survey
    Bennett, Victor M.
    Chatterji, Aaron K.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (01) : 86 - 116
  • [3] Flexible workplace practices: Evidence from a nationally representative survey
    Gittleman, M
    Horrigan, M
    Joyce, M
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1998, 52 (01): : 99 - 115
  • [4] Age Differences in Personality: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Australian Sample
    Lucas, Richard E.
    Donnellan, M. Brent
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 45 (05) : 1353 - 1363
  • [5] Understanding Water Consumption in Qatar: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Survey
    Al-Maadid, Alanoud
    Akesson, Jesper
    Bernstein, David H.
    Chakravarti, Jayani
    Khalifa, Ahmed
    [J]. URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (10) : 1450 - 1461
  • [6] Farmers' Preference for Farming: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Farm Survey in India
    Birthal, Pratap S.
    Roy, Devesh
    Khan, Md Tajuddin
    Negi, Digvijay Singh
    [J]. DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2015, 53 (02): : 122 - 134
  • [7] Sickness absence and mental health: evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey
    Wooden, Mark
    Bubonya, Melisa
    Cobb-Clark, Deborah
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2016, 42 (03) : 201 - 208
  • [8] Valuing health at different ages: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in the US
    Eisenberg D.
    Freed G.L.
    Davis M.M.
    Singer D.
    Prosser L.A.
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2011, 9 (3) : 149 - 156
  • [9] Performance of agricultural extension agents in Indonesia: evidence from a nationally representative survey
    Dewi, Yovita Anggita
    Bahru, Bezawit Adugna
    Zeller, Manfred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2024,
  • [10] Correlates and impact of crop insurance in India: evidence from a nationally representative survey
    Cariappa, A. G. Adeeth
    Mahida, Darshnaben P.
    Lal, Priyanka
    Chandel, B. S.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2021, 81 (02) : 204 - 221