Producer breeding objectives and optimal sire selection

被引:17
|
作者
Tozer, PR [1 ]
Stokes, JR
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Dairy & Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
individual mate selection; multiple-objective; integer programming; producer objectives;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74441-X
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Information from an online survey of dairy producers was used to determine how important producers perceived three different objectives in the breeding problem. The objectives were: maximizing expected net merit of the progeny, minimizing the expected progeny inbreeding coefficient, and minimizing semen expenditure. Producers were asked to rank the three objectives and then to weight the importance of each objective relative to the others. This information was then used to determine weights to be used in a multiple-objective integer program designed to select individual mates for a herd of 76 Jersey cows with known genetic background and cow net merit. The results of the multiple-objective models show that rank and relative importance of producer objectives can affect the portfolio of sires selected. Producers whose primary objective was to maximize expected net merit had a range of average expected progeny net merit of $306 to $310, but the level of expected progeny inbreeding was from 6.99 to 10.45%, with a semen cost per conception of $35 to $41. For producers who selected minimizing progeny inbreeding as the primary goal in their breeding programs, the range of inbreeding was from 6.11 to 6.60%, with lower net merit range of $274 to $301 and semen expenditure of $30 to $37 per conception. One producer selected minimizing semen cost as the primary objective. For that producer's portfolio, the semen cost was $27 per conception and net merit was $288, with a progeny inbreeding coefficient of 10.68%. The results of this research suggest that producer information and goals have a substantial impact on the portfolio of sires selected by that producer to attain these goals.
引用
收藏
页码:3518 / 3525
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sire selection with multiple objectives
    Stokes, JR
    Tozer, PR
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 73 (02) : 147 - 164
  • [2] SELECTION TRAITS AND OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAMS IN PIG BREEDING
    SCHAAF, A
    HERRENDORFER, G
    RITTER, E
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 1985, 28 (03): : 217 - 228
  • [3] The predicted benefits of genomic selection on pig breeding objectives
    Sharif-Islam, Md
    van Der Werf, Julius H. J.
    Wood, Benjamin J.
    Hermesch, Susanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2024,
  • [4] Participatory definition of breeding objectives and selection indexes for sheep breeding in traditional systems
    Gizaw, Solomon
    Komen, Hans
    van Arendonk, Johan A. M.
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 128 (1-3) : 67 - 74
  • [5] Genetic selection for health traits using producer-recorded data. I. Incidence rates, heritability estimates, and sire breeding values
    Zwald, NR
    Weigel, KA
    Chang, YM
    Welper, RD
    Clay, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (12) : 4287 - 4294
  • [6] SELECTION IN POTENTIAL BREEDING BULLS WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION TO THE BULL SIRE AND ORIGIN OF STOCK
    ROMANOWSKI, W
    MARRE, H
    [J]. ZUCHTHYGIENE-REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 1985, 20 (03): : 126 - 127
  • [7] Genetic benefits of genomic selection breeding programmes considering foreign sire contributions
    Daragh Matthews
    John F. Kearney
    Andrew R. Cromie
    Fiona S. Hely
    Peter R. Amer
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 51
  • [8] Genetic benefits of genomic selection breeding programmes considering foreign sire contributions
    Matthews, Daragh
    Kearney, John F.
    Cromie, Andrew R.
    Hely, Fiona S.
    Amer, Peter R.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2019, 51 (1)
  • [9] New breeding objectives and selection indices for the Australian dairy industry
    Byrne, T. J.
    Santos, B. F. S.
    Amer, P. R.
    Martin-Collado, D.
    Pryce, J. E.
    Axford, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (10) : 8146 - 8167
  • [10] Assessing the value of improved marbling in beef breeding objectives and selection
    Barwick, SA
    Henzell, AL
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1999, 50 (04): : 503 - 512