A Comparison of Pressure and Tilt Input Techniques for Cursor Control

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Xiaolei [1 ]
Ren, Xiangshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kochi Univ Technol, Kami 7828502, Japan
来源
关键词
pressure input; tilt input; target selection tasks; pen-based interfaces;
D O I
10.1587/transinf.E92.D.1683
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, by coupling this control with cursor position, angle and scale. Comparisons between pen pressure input and pen tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very poor performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In "Experiment 1-Coupling to Cursor Position", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique in terms of time. even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In "Experiment 2-Coupling to Cursor Angle", the tilt input performed a little better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time, but the gap between them is not so apparent as Experiment 1. In "Experiment 3-Coupling to Cursor Scale", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time. Based on the results of our experiments, we have inferred several design implications and guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1691
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empirical Comparison of Pen Pressure and Pen Tilt Input Techniques
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Ren, Xiangshi
    Hui, Yue
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 982 - +
  • [2] Input techniques that dynamically change their cursor activation area:: A comparison of bubble and cell cursors
    Hertzum, Morten
    Hornbaek, Kasper
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2007, 65 (10) : 833 - 851
  • [3] Integrated Head-Tilt and Electromyographic Cursor Control
    Vojtech, Jennifer M.
    Hablani, Surbhi
    Cler, Gabriel J.
    Stepp, Cara E.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2020, 28 (06) : 1442 - 1451
  • [4] Comparative Study on Cursor Position Controlled by Pen Pressure and Pen Tilt
    Zhou Xiaolei
    [J]. 2014 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN (ISCID 2014), VOL 2, 2014,
  • [5] Comparison of Gaze Cursor Input Methods for Virtual Reality Devices
    Choe, Mungyeong
    Choi, Yeongcheol
    Park, Jaehyun
    Kim, Hyun K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2019, 35 (07) : 620 - 629
  • [6] Java']Javardeye: Gaze Input for Cursor Control in a Structured Editor
    Santos, Andre L.
    [J]. COMPANION PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE ART, SCIENCE, AND ENGINEERING OF PROGRAMMING (PROGRAMMING 2021 COMPANION), 2021, : 31 - 35
  • [7] Use of voice input to enhance cursor control in mainstream gaming applications
    Kehoe, Aidan
    Neff, Flaithri
    Pitt, Ian
    [J]. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2009, 8 (02) : 89 - 96
  • [8] Use of voice input to enhance cursor control in mainstream gaming applications
    Aidan Kehoe
    Flaithri Neff
    Ian Pitt
    [J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2009, 8 : 89 - 96
  • [9] Tilt Techniques: Investigating the Dexterity of Wrist-based Input
    Rahman, Mahfuz
    Gustafson, Sean
    Irani, Pourang
    Subramanian, Sriram
    [J]. CHI2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1943 - 1952
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF COMPUTER INPUT DEVICES - LINUS PEN, MOUSE, CURSOR KEYS AND KEYBOARD
    MAHACH, KR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS SOCIETY 33RD ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 1: PERSPECTIVES, 1989, : 330 - 334