Risk-return preferences in the pension domain: Are people able to choose?

被引:58
|
作者
van Rooij, Maarten C. J.
Kool, Clemens J. M.
Prast, Henriette M.
机构
[1] De Nederlansche Bank, Econ & Res Div, NL-1000 AB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Utrecht Sch Econ, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
investor autonomy; pension preferences; risk tolerance; defined contribution schemes;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents new evidence for the Netherlands on pension preferences and investor autonomy in the pension domain using a representative survey of about 1000 Dutch citizens. Our main conclusions are the following. Risk aversion is domain dependent and highest in the pension domain. The vast majority of respondents favours the currently dominant defined benefit pension system. If offered a combined defined benefit/defined contribution system, the majority would like to have a guaranteed pension income of at least 70% of their net labour income. Self-assessed risk tolerance and financial expertise are important individual explanatory variables of pension attitudes. The average respondent considers himself financially unsophisticated and is reluctant to take control of retirement savings investment, even when offered the possibility to increase expertise. Respondents who have chosen a relatively safe portfolio tend to switch to the riskier median portfolio when they are shown future income streams. This again suggests that many respondents currently lack the skills to have investor autonomy over investment for retirement. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 722
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The risk-return profile of Lithuanian private pension funds
    Kabasinskas, Audrius
    Sutiene, Kristina
    Kopa, Milos
    Valakevicius, Eimutis
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2017, 30 (01): : 1611 - 1630
  • [2] EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF RISK-RETURN PREFERENCES OF INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS
    BAKER, HK
    HARGROVE, MB
    HASLEM, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1977, 12 (03) : 377 - 389
  • [3] Reference-dependent preferences and the risk-return trade-off
    Wang, Huijun
    Yan, Jinghua
    Yu, Jianfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 123 (02) : 395 - 414
  • [4] INVESTOR RISK-RETURN PREFERENCES .1. PROFESSIONAL AND FINANCIAL CHARACTERISTICS
    BAKER, HK
    HARGROVE, MB
    HASLEM, JA
    [J]. ATLANTA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1977, 27 (03): : 48 - 54
  • [5] Risk-return profile
    Whalen, Richard Christopher
    [J]. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 2007, 86 (03) : 162 - 163
  • [6] Risk-return profile - Reply
    Mallaby, Sebastian
    [J]. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 2007, 86 (03) : 163 - 164
  • [7] The risk-return relation puzzle
    Guo, Hui
    Pai, Yu-Jou
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 69
  • [8] Disagreement and the risk-return relation
    Jia, Yun
    Yang, Chunpeng
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 64 : 97 - 104
  • [9] Risk-return relationship and individualism
    Seo, Sung Won
    Kim, Jiseob
    Kim, Jun Sik
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (08) : 760 - 766
  • [10] Can asset allocation limits determine portfolio risk-return profiles in DC pension schemes?
    Gutierrez, Tomas
    Pagnoncelli, Bernardo
    Valladao, Davi
    Cifuentes, Arturo
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2019, 86 : 134 - 144