Should feed mills go beyond traditional least cost formulation?

被引:15
|
作者
Pathumnakul, Supachai [2 ]
Ittiphalin, Mongkon [2 ]
Piewthongngam, Kullapapruk [1 ]
Rujikietkumjorn, Somkiet [2 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Management Sci, Esaan Ctr Business & Econ Res, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
关键词
Feed scheduling; Multiple periods planning; Feed cost; Feed recipe; Heuristic algorithm; Mathematical model; LOT-SIZING MODEL; INDUSTRY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2010.11.009
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Due to the pressure to become more competitive, feed mills coordinate closely with their suppliers and customers by forward purchasing raw materials and integrating with downstream units such as animal producers. To integrate downstream units and forward purchase raw materials, the mill must explore new paradigms for managing integrated information. The close relationship between customers, suppliers and the feed mill allows the feed manager to access information that was not previously available, such as the price of raw materials and the demand for feed products, which creates a more deterministic environment. In the present study, to exploit information from the integration of production units, an extended planning horizon was evaluated by developing a mathematical model and a heuristic algorithm for multiple period planning. The simulated results indicated that feed mills are likely to benefit from expanding the planning horizon. On average, the costs obtained from multiple-period planning were approximately 2.55% lower than those of single-period planning. Moreover, because recipe costs fluctuate dramatically, mills benefit from multiple-period planning by accounting for variations in recipe costs. However, the savings of multiple period planning are limited by other factors such as inventory holding costs and the warehouse inventory of the feed mill. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FEED FORMULATION FOR LEAST COST OF GAIN
    MCDONOUGH, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1971, 53 (01) : 106 - +
  • [2] PROPORTIONALITY AMONG NUTRIENTS IN LEAST COST FEED FORMULATION
    PESTI, GM
    MILLER, BR
    CAREY, CA
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1985, 64 (05) : 824 - 831
  • [3] EFFECT OF COMPUTER PACKAGE FOR LEAST COST FEED FORMULATION FOR POULTRY
    KOTOB, S
    ALGHUNAIM, R
    ALHAMADI, H
    HUSSEINI, M
    SALMAN, AJ
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1981, 60 (07) : 1613 - 1614
  • [4] INTERPRETATION OF DUAL VARIABLE IN LEAST-COST FEED FORMULATION
    HOCHSTETLER, HW
    SCOTT, ML
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1976, 55 (05) : 2045 - 2045
  • [5] FeedMaster: A least-cost feed formulation App for minimizing the cost and maximizing milk yield
    Kabir, Md Ahsanul
    Sultana, Nasrin
    Al Noman, Abdullah
    Hossain, S. M. Jahangir
    Miraz, Md Faizul Hossain
    Deb, Gautam Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED VETERINARY AND ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2022, 9 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [6] LEAST-COST POULTRY FEED FORMULATION - PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, AND A NEW MICROCOMPUTER PROGRAM
    PESTI, GM
    MILLER, BR
    [J]. GEORGIA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1988, (354): : 1 - 44
  • [7] A COURSE IN LEAST COST FORMULATION
    JONES, JE
    BIRRENKOTT, G
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1982, 61 (07) : 1488 - 1488
  • [8] Reducing nitrogen excretion in pigs by modifying the traditional least-cost formulation algorithm
    Bailleul, PJD
    Rivest, J
    Dubeau, F
    Pomar, C
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2001, 72 (03): : 199 - 211
  • [9] LEAST COST BROILER FEED MIX
    RAJENDRAN, K
    PRABAHARAN, R
    KUMARARAJ, R
    [J]. INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1992, 69 (07): : 637 - 640
  • [10] Alternatives to formulate laying hen diets beyond the traditional least-cost model
    Moss, A. F.
    Parkinson, G.
    Crowley, T. M.
    Pesti, G. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (01):