All or nothing: Climate policy when assets can become stranded

被引:23
|
作者
Kalkuhl, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Steckel, Jan Christoph [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Edenhofer, Ottmar [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Torgauer Str 12-15, D-10829 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, August Bebel Str 89, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Str 17,Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Telegraphenberg A 31, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Climate policy; Optimal control; Political economy; Public finance; Credible policy; Time inconsistency; ENERGY; SUBSIDIES; COMMITMENT; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2019.01.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops a new perspective on stranded assets in climate policy using a partial equilibrium model of the energy sector. Political-economy related aspects are considered in the government's objective function. Lobbying power of firms or fiscal considerations by the government lead to time inconsistency: The government will deviate from a previously announced carbon tax which creates stranded assets. Under rational expectations, we show that a time-consistent policy outcome exists with either a zero carbon tax or a prohibitive carbon tax that leads to zero fossil investments - an "all-or-nothing" policy. Although stranded assets are crucial to such a bipolar outcome, they disappear again under time-consistent policy. Which of the two outcomes (all or nothing) prevails depends on the lobbying power of owners of fixed factors (land and fossil resources) but not on fiscal revenue considerations or on the lobbying power of renewable or fossil energy firms. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条