Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the Start of COVID-19 Vaccine Deployment in the UK: An Embedded Mixed-Methods Study

被引:26
|
作者
Roberts, Chrissy H. [1 ]
Brindle, Hannah [1 ]
Rogers, Nina T. [2 ]
Eggo, Rosalind M. [3 ]
Enria, Luisa [4 ]
Lees, Shelley [4 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Clin Res, London, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Global Hlth & Dev, London, England
关键词
COVID-19; vaccines; mixed-methods; anthropology; trust; misinformation; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.745630
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Approval for the use of COVID-19 vaccines has been granted in a number of countries but there are concerns that vaccine uptake may be low amongst certain groups.Methods: This study used a mixed methods approach based on online survey and an embedded quantitative/qualitative design to explore perceptions and attitudes that were associated with intention to either accept or refuse offers of vaccination in different demographic groups during the early stages of the UK's mass COVID-19 vaccination programme (December 2020). Analysis used multivariate logistic regression, structural text modeling and anthropological assessments.Results: Of 4,535 respondents, 85% (n = 3,859) were willing to have a COVID-19 vaccine. The rapidity of vaccine development and uncertainties about safety were common reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. There was no evidence for the widespread influence of mis-information, although broader vaccine hesitancy was associated with intentions to refuse COVID-19 vaccines (OR 20.60, 95% CI 14.20-30.30, p < 0.001). Low levels of trust in the decision-making (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.08, 2.48, p = 0.021) and truthfulness (OR 8.76, 95% CI 4.15-19.90, p < 0.001) of the UK government were independently associated with higher odds of refusing COVID-19 vaccines. Compared to political centrists, conservatives and liberals were, respectively, more (OR 2.05, 95%CI 1.51-2.80, p < 0.001) and less (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.22-0.41, p < 0.001) likely to refuse offered vaccines. Those who were willing to be vaccinated cited both personal and public protection as reasons, with some alluding to having a sense of collective responsibility.Conclusion: Dominant narratives of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy are misconceived as primarily being driven by misinformation. Key indicators of UK vaccine acceptance include prior behaviors, transparency of the scientific process of vaccine development, mistrust in science and leadership and individual political views. Vaccine programmes should leverage the sense of altruism, citizenship and collective responsibility that motivated many participants to get vaccinated.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers in Tanzania: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Amour, Maryam A.
    Mboya, Innocent B.
    Ndumwa, Harrieth P.
    Kengia, James T.
    Metta, Emmy
    Njiro, Belinda J.
    Nyamuryekung'e, Kasusu Klint
    Mhamilawa, Lwidiko E.
    Shayo, Elizabeth H.
    Ngalesoni, Frida
    Kapologwe, Ntuli
    Sunguya, Bruno
    Msuya, Sia E.
    Kalolo, Albino
    [J]. COVID, 2023, 3 (05): : 777 - 791
  • [2] COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy of Parents of Children with Type 1 Diabetes in Turkiye: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Celik, Taylan
    Dogan, Durmus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INFECTION, 2023, 17 (02): : 105 - 111
  • [3] COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Acceptance, and Promotion Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Beth L. Hoffman
    Cassandra L. Boness
    Kar-Hai Chu
    Riley Wolynn
    Larissa Sallowicz
    Dino Mintas
    Antoine B. Douaihy
    Elizabeth M. Felter
    Jaime E. Sidani
    [J]. Journal of Community Health, 2022, 47 : 750 - 758
  • [4] COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Acceptance, and Promotion Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Hoffman, Beth L.
    Boness, Cassandra L.
    Chu, Kar-Hai
    Wolynn, Riley
    Sallowicz, Larissa
    Mintas, Dino
    Douaihy, Antoine B.
    Felter, Elizabeth M.
    Sidani, Jaime E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 47 (05) : 750 - 758
  • [5] Vaccine Hesitancy and Factors Related to Vaccine Hesitancy in COVID-19 Vaccination among a Tribal Community of Meghalaya: A Mixed Methods Study
    Sundaram, Shanthosh P.
    Devi, Ningombam J.
    Lyngdoh, Markordor
    Medhi, Gajendra K.
    Lynrah, Wallambok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [6] Vaccine Hesitancy and Factors Related to Vaccine Hesitancy in COVID-19 Vaccination among a Tribal Community of Meghalaya: A Mixed Methods Study
    Sundaram, Shanthosh P.
    Devi, Ningombam J.
    Lyngdoh, Markordor
    Medhi, Gajendra K.
    Lynrah, Wallambok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [7] COVID-19 vaccination in the UK: Addressing vaccine hesitancy
    Sonawane, Kalyani
    Troisi, Catherine L.
    Deshmukh, Ashish A.
    [J]. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2021, 1
  • [8] Considering Emotion in COVID-19 Vaccine Communication: Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy and Fostering Vaccine Confidence
    Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia
    Budenz, Alexandra
    [J]. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2020, 35 (14) : 1718 - 1722
  • [9] Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study
    Robertson, Elaine
    Reeve, Kelly S.
    Niedzwiedz, Claire L.
    Moore, Jamie
    Blake, Margaret
    Green, Michael
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Benzeval, Michaela J.
    [J]. BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2021, 94 : 41 - 50
  • [10] Anaphylaxis and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Update on COVID-19 vaccine confidence among those living with allergy
    Batac, A.
    Merrill, K. A.
    Golding, M. A.
    Askin, N.
    Abrams, E. M.
    Begin, P.
    Ben-Shoshan, M.
    Ladouceur, E.
    Roos, L. E.
    Protudjer, V.
    Protudjer, J.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2023, 78 : 22 - 23