Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire for Persons with Transtibial Amputations

被引:3
|
作者
Giray, Esra [1 ]
Eshraghi, Arezoo [2 ]
Gunduz, Osman Hakan [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, PROPEL Lab, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
amputation; prosthesis; Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire; psychometrics; rehabilitation; satisfaction; validation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT; SATISFACTION; TRANSLATION; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/JPO.0000000000000343
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Satisfaction with the donning and doffing procedure of prosthesis is related to the quality of life of individuals with amputation, and it should be assessed to gather information about related challenges, thus forming the basis for possible solutions. This study aimed to investigate the construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire for individuals with transtibial amputation. Materials and Methods After a translation/retranslation process, 30 individuals with transtibial amputation were recruited to evaluate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The participants were asked to fill in the Turkish version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Prosthesis Survey, and the Nottingham Health Profile. The Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire was readministered after 3 days. Results Test-retest reliability showed good intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 0.739; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.87). There was a statistically significant correlation between the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire, the Satisfaction with the Prosthesis Survey (rho = 0.419, P = 0.02), and Nottingham Health Profile (rho = -0.656, P = 0.0001), and its subsets (P < 0.05) showed construct validity. Conclusions The Turkish version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to assess donning and doffing of prostheses for individuals with transtibial amputation.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prosthesis donning and doffing questionnaire: Development and validation
    Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
    Eshraghi, Arezoo
    Gholizadeh, Hossein
    Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Wan
    Lechler, Knut
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 41 (06) : 571 - 578
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire
    Repo, Jussi Petteri
    Piitulainen, Kirsi
    Hakkinen, Arja
    Roine, Risto Paavo
    Kautiainen, Hannu
    Becker, Paju
    Tukiainen, Erkki Juhani
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (17) : 2081 - 2087
  • [3] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of breathlessness beliefs questionnaire
    Gurses, Hulya Nilgun
    Saka, Seda
    Zeren, Melih
    Bayram, Mehmet
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (04) : 834 - 839
  • [4] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma
    cakmak, Aslihan
    Simsek, Senem
    Ince, Deniz Inal
    Saglam, Melda
    Kutukcue, Ebru Calik
    Yagli, Naciye Vardar
    Karakaya, Guel
    [J]. THORACIC RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 24 (04) : 194 - 201
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the morningness - Eveningness questionnaire
    Ozdalyan, Firat
    Tutuncu, Ozkan
    Gumus, Hikmet
    Acikgoz, Osman
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (01): : 50 - 59
  • [6] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of clinical stress questionnaire
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Acaroglu, Rengin
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2008, 28 (06) : 737 - 743
  • [7] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE
    SAHIN, NH
    SAHIN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 48 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [8] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Sar, Vedat
    Ozturk, Erdinc
    Ikikardes, Eda
    [J]. TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (04): : 1054 - 1063
  • [9] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    S. Sarmer
    S. Ergin
    G. Yavuzer
    [J]. Rheumatology International, 2000, 20 : 9 - 12
  • [10] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
    Erdogan, Sengul
    Ucpunar, Habibe K.
    Cangoz Tavat, Banu
    [J]. TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (04) : 274 - 279