Predicted and Measured Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness From Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

被引:9
|
作者
Schrems, Wolfgang A. [1 ]
Schrems-Hoesl, LauraM. [1 ]
Bendschneider, Delia [1 ]
Mardin, Christian Y. [1 ]
Laemmer, Robert [1 ]
Kruse, Friedrich E. [1 ]
Horn, Folkert K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Ophthalmol, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
OCT; GLAUCOMA; AGREEMENT; EYES; VARIABILITY; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2427
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE New methods are needed to compare peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFLT) measurements taken from time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). OBJECTIVE To compare the agreement of measured and predicted pRNFLT using different equations based on pRNFLT measurements obtained by TD-OCT and SD-OCT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional single-center study that took place at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg from November 16, 2005, to June 3, 2015, and included 138 eyes of control participants, 126 eyes of patients with ocular hypertension, 128 eyes of patients with preperimetric glaucoma, and 160 eyes of patients with perimetric glaucoma. All participants had standard clinical examinations to obtain TD-OCT (via Stratus OCT) and SD-OCT (via Spectralis OCT) measurements of pRNFLT. Two groups were matched for diagnostic subgroup, eye side, sex, and age. The TD-OCT measurements of the first group were used to predict the mean SD-OCT and 6-sector vertical-split pRNFLT measurements of the second group and vice versa. The agreement between the predicted pRNFLT calculations of conversion equations and measured pRNFLT of the second group was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean and sectoral pRNFLT measurements obtained by TD-OCT and SD-OCT as well as the agreement between measured and predicted pRNFLT. RESULTS The agreement for all investigated equations to predict mean pRNFLT measurements with intraclass correlation coeffecients ranged from 0.937 to 0.939. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated systemic biases between -0.7 mu m and +1.1 mu m for measured and predicted mean pRNFLT measurements. The ratio method demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.969 for the temporal-inferior sector. The best color-code agreement between both OCT devices was achieved by the no conversion method, with. = 0.731 (95% CI, 0.656-0.806) for the mean pRNFLT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These data suggest that the prediction of mean pRNFLT values by equations derived from TD-OCT and SD-OCT can be conducted with high levels of agreement. In individual cases and singular sectors, high prediction errors may occur. When longitudinal imaging data from both TD-OCT and SD-OCT are available, conversion equations may provide longitudinal comparability.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1143
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agreement of predicted and measured retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography
    Laemmer, Robert
    Schrems, Wolfgang A.
    Schrems-Hoesl, Laura M.
    Horn, Folkert K.
    Kruse, Friedrich E.
    Mardin, Christian Y.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [2] Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Visual Sensitivity Using Spectral-Domain and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Tavares, I. M.
    Jose, A. Kara
    Barbosa, D. V. C.
    Almeida, E. D., Jr.
    Leite, M. T.
    Endo, A. T. N. H.
    Santos, C. R. S.
    Melo, L. A. S., Jr.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [3] Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Normal Eyes Using Time-Domain and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Seibold, Leonard K.
    Mandava, Naresh
    Kahook, Malik Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 150 (06) : 807 - 814
  • [4] Influence of Cataract on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Time-Domain and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Kim, N.
    Lee, H.
    Lee, E.
    Kim, J.
    Byeon, S.
    Kim, S.
    Hong, S.
    Seong, G.
    Kim, C.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [5] Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in NMO Patients
    Lange, Alex P.
    Sadjadi, Reza
    Zhu, Feng
    Alkabie, Samir
    Costello, Fiona
    Traboulsee, Anthony L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 33 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [6] Time-Domain and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in MS Patients and Healthy Controls
    Lange, Alex P.
    Sadjadi, Reza
    Saeedi, Jameelah
    Lindley, Janette
    Costello, Fiona
    Traboulsee, Anthony L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [7] Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and diagnostic capability of spectral-domain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography
    Kaushik, Sushmita
    Pandav, Surinder Singh
    Ichhpujani, Parul
    Gupta, Amod
    Gupta, Pramod
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) : 566 - 572
  • [8] Retinal nerve fibre layer and macular thickness in amblyopia as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
    Al-Haddad, Christiane E.
    Mollayess, Georges M. E. L.
    Cherfan, Carol G.
    Jaafar, Dalida F.
    Bashshur, Ziad F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 95 (12) : 1696 - 1699
  • [9] Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Optic Neuritis
    Rebolleda, G.
    Garcia-Garcia, A.
    Kim, H. -R. Won
    Munoz-Negrete, F. J.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [10] Estimating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal schoolchildren with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
    Tsai, Der-Chong
    Huang, Nicole
    Hwu, Jinn-Jong
    Jueng, Ruo-Nan
    Chou, Pesus
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 56 (04) : 362 - 370