Practice Arrangement and Medicare Physician Payment in Otolaryngology

被引:8
|
作者
Cracchiolo, Jennifer [1 ]
Ridge, John A. [2 ,3 ]
Egleston, Brian [4 ]
Lango, Miriam [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Otolaryngol, Temple Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg Oncol, Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Head & Neck Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
otolaryngology; Medicare; practice arrangement; provider payment; utilization; hospital care intensity index; academic; REGIONAL-VARIATION; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; ASSOCIATION; OWNERSHIP; COHORTS; RATES;
D O I
10.1177/0194599815578102
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective Medicare Part B physician payment indicates a cost to Medicare beneficiaries for a physician service and connotes physician clinical productivity. The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between practice arrangement and Medicare physician payment. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Medicare provider utilization and payment data. Subjects and Methods Otolaryngologists from 1 metropolitan area were included as part of a pilot study. A generalized linear model was used to determine the effect of practice-specific variables including patient volumes on physician payment. Results Of 67 otolaryngologists included, 23 (34%) provided services through an independent practice, while others were employed by 1 of 3 local academic centers. Median payment was $58,895 per physician for the year, although some physicians received substantially higher payments. Reimbursements to faculty at 1 academic department were higher than to those at other institutions or to independent practitioners. After adjustments were made for patient volumes, physician subspecialty, and gender, payments to each faculty at Hospital C were 2 times higher than to those at Hospital A (relative ratio [RR] 2.03; 95% CI, 1.27-3.27; P = .003); 2 times higher than to faculty at Hospital B (RR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7; P = .0001); and 1.6 times higher than to independent practitioners (RR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.04-2.7; P = .03). Payments to physicians in the other groups were not significantly different. Differences in reimbursement corresponded to an emphasis on procedures over office visits but not Medicare case mix adjustments for patient discharges from associated institutions. Conclusions Variation in the cost of academic otolaryngology care may be subject in part to institutional factors.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 987
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条