Assessing land use and flood management impacts on ecosystem services in a river landscape (Upper Danube, Germany)

被引:21
|
作者
Stammel, Barbara [1 ]
Fischer, Christine [2 ,3 ]
Cyffka, Bernd [1 ]
Albert, Christian [4 ]
Damm, Christian [5 ]
Dehnhardt, Alexandra [6 ,7 ]
Fischer, Helmut [8 ]
Foeckler, Francis [9 ]
Gerstner, Lars [5 ]
Hoffmann, Tim G. [10 ]
Iwanowski, Janette [10 ]
Kasperidus, Hans D. [2 ]
Linnemann, Kathrin [8 ,13 ]
Mehl, Dietmar [10 ]
Podschun, Simone A. [11 ]
Rayanov, Marin [6 ]
Ritz, Stephanie [14 ]
Rumm, Andrea [9 ]
Scholz, Mathias [2 ]
Schulz-Zunkel, Christiane [2 ]
Thiele, Julia [12 ]
Venohr, Markus [11 ]
von Haaren, Christina [12 ]
Pusch, Martin T. [11 ]
Gelhaus, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Cathol Univ Eichstatt Ingolstadt, Floodplain Inst Neuburg, Neuburg Donau, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Conservat Biol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Inst Geosci, Jena, Germany
[4] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Geog, Bochum, Germany
[5] KIT Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Dept Wetland Ecol, Karlsruhe, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Berlin, Environm & Land Econ, Berlin, Germany
[7] Inst Ecol Econ Res, Berlin, Germany
[8] Fed Inst Hydrol BfG, Koblenz, Germany
[9] OKONAss Landscape Ecol Limnol & Environm Plannin, Kallmunz, Germany
[10] Biota Inst Ecol Res & Planning Ltd, Butzow, Germany
[11] Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
[12] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, Hannover, Germany
[13] State Agcy Environm Rhineland Palatine, Mainz, Germany
[14] Fed Agcy Nat Conservat BfN, Bonn, Germany
关键词
assessment; cultural; floodplains; index; inter-sectoral management; regulating and provisioning ecosystem services; stakeholders; FLOODPLAINS; DEGRADATION; BUNDLES; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/rra.3669
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rivers and floodplains provide many regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem services (ES) such as flood risk regulation, crop production or recreation. Intensive use of resources such as hydropower production, construction of detention basins and intensive agriculture substantially change ecosystems and may affect their capacity to provide ES. Legal frameworks such as the European Water Framework Directive, Bird and Habitats Directive and Floods Directive already address various uses and interests. However, management is still sectoral and often potential synergies or trade-offs between sectors are not considered. The ES concept could support a joint and holistic evaluation of impacts and proactively suggest advantageous options. The river ecosystem service index (RESI) method evaluates the capacity of floodplains to provide ES by using a standardized five-point scale for 1 km-floodplain segments based on available spatial data. This scaling allows consistent scoring of all ES and their integration into a single index. The aim of this article is to assess ES impacts of different flood prevention scenarios on a 75 km section of the Danube river corridor in Germany. The RESI method was applied to evaluate scenario effects on 13 ES with the standardized five-point scale. Synergies and trade-offs were identified as well as ES bundles and dependencies on land use and connectivity. The ratio of actual and former floodplain has the strongest influence on the total ES provision: the higher the percentage and area of an active floodplain, the higher the sum of ES. The RESI method proved useful to support decision-making in regional planning.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conflicts of the Land Use and Ecosystem Services in the Riverine Landscape of the Little Danube
    Miklosova, Viktoria
    Kozelova, Ivana
    [J]. WATER, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [2] Quantifying Land Use/Land Cover and Landscape Pattern Changes and Impacts on Ecosystem Services
    Zhao, Qingjian
    Wen, Zuomin
    Chen, Shulin
    Ding, Sheng
    Zhang, Minxin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [3] Impacts of Land Use Changes on Wetland Ecosystem Services in the Tumen River Basin
    Zhang, Yanan
    Jin, Ri
    Zhu, Weihong
    Zhang, Da
    Zhang, Xiaoxue
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 15
  • [4] Distinguishing the impacts of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in a karst landscape in China
    Peng, Jian
    Tian, Lu
    Zhang, Zimo
    Zhao, Yan
    Green, Sophie M.
    Quine, Timothy A.
    Liu, Hongyan
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 46
  • [5] Assessing ecological and social uncertainty in the evaluation of land-use impacts on ecosystem services
    Quetier, Fabien
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Daigney, Sophie
    de Chazal, Jacqueline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (03) : 173 - 199
  • [6] Assessing the Impacts of Land-Use Zoning Decisions on the Supply of Forest Ecosystem Services
    Karkkainen, Leena
    Haakana, Helena
    Hirvela, Hannu
    Lempinen, Reetta
    Packalen, Tuula
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (09):
  • [7] Assessing Impacts of Soil Management Measures on Ecosystem Services
    Schwilch, Gudrun
    Lemann, Tatenda
    Berglund, Orjan
    Camarotto, Carlo
    Cerda, Artemi
    Daliakopoulos, Ioannis N.
    Kohnova, Silvia
    Krzeminska, Dominika
    Maranon, Teodoro
    Rietra, Rene
    Siebielec, Grzegorz
    Thorsson, Johann
    Tibbett, Mark
    Valente, Sandra
    van Delden, Hedwig
    van den Akker, Jan
    Verzandvoort, Simone
    Vrinceanu, Nicoleta Olimpia
    Zoumides, Christos
    Hessel, Rudi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [8] Ecological risk assessment models for simulating impacts of land use and landscape pattern on ecosystem services
    Qian, Yao
    Dong, Zheng
    Yan, Yan
    Tang, Lina
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 833
  • [9] Regional Impacts of Climate and Land Cover on Ecosystem Water Retention Services in the Upper Yangtze River Basin
    Xu, Pei
    Guo, Yingman
    Fu, Bin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [10] Impacts of climate and land use changes on flood risk management for the Schijn River, Belgium
    Akter, Tahmina
    Quevauviller, Philippe
    Eisenreich, Steven J.
    Vaes, Guido
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 89 : 163 - 175