Transrectal ultrasound-guided punch biopsies of the prostate. Indication, technique, results, and complications

The golden standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer is transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-Bx). The optimal number of cylinders, sampling design, and indications for repeat biopsy are still in a state of flux. At the beginning of the 1980s, considerable doubts persisted regarding the benefit of ultra-sound-guided punch biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The examination on a chair with a fixed ultrasound head caused the patient substantial discomfort. Besides, in the pre-PSA era, most prostate carcinomas were detected by palpation and digitally guided biopsies were easily obtained. Indeed, the DRU procedure alone exhibited low sensitivity. Keetch et al. found that in only 25% of patients with abnormal palpatory findings and PSA between 4 and 20 ng/ml was a carcinoma revealed upon biopsy. On the other hand, patients with suspicious palpatory findings and proven malignancy suffered more frequently from locally advanced and systemic metastasized tumours. As a result of restaging based on PSA, in most series more than half of the detected carcinomas presented normal palpatory findings. Ultrasound examination made precise imaging of zonal structures possible and thus offered the advantage of precision guidance for tissue biopsy despite lower sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of suspicious lesions. Furthermore, calculation of prostate volume was possible. At the end of the 1980s, Hodge defined the systematic sextant biopsy as the first golden standard for early detection of prostate cancer. This meant the systematic removal of three punch cylinders from both lateral lobes of the prostate in the parasagittal midline at various levels (apex, middle, and base).