Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know about Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing

被引:1
|
作者
McCormack, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Lederman Law Lib, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源
LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL | 2009年 / 101卷 / 01期
关键词
JAN; 20; 2006; RETRACTED SEE; PG; 335; ARTICLE; AUTHORS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Legal publishing is changing, and more legal periodicals are requiring that submitted papers undergo peer review using one of three systems: open, single-blind, or double-blind. As the use of peer review in these journals increases, and as the call for law reviews to change their method of article selection grows, our patrons will want to know the difference between the various peer review methods and why a journal's editors might select one method over another. Professor McCormack provides an overview of all three methods, and discusses the future of the peer review process in the publication of articles in legal periodicals.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 70
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind?
    Tony Bazi
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 481 - 483
  • [2] Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind?
    Bazi, Tony
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (03) : 481 - 483
  • [3] Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
    Moylan, Elizabeth C.
    Harold, Simon
    O'Neill, Ciaran
    Kowalczuk, Maria K.
    [J]. BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 15
  • [4] Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation
    Kalavar, Meghana
    Watane, Arjun
    Wu, David
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Mruthyunjaya, Prithvi
    Parikh, Ravi
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [5] Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
    Elizabeth C Moylan
    Simon Harold
    Ciaran O’Neill
    Maria K Kowalczuk
    [J]. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 15
  • [6] Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige
    Okike, Kanu
    Hug, Kevin T.
    Kocher, Mininder S.
    Leopold, Seth S.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (12): : 1315 - 1316
  • [7] Editorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?
    Susanne Prediger
    David Wagner
    [J]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2022, 111 : 1 - 3
  • [8] Editorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?
    Prediger, Susanne
    Wagner, David
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2022, 111 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [9] IOP Publishing to implement double-blind peer review
    Banks, Michael
    [J]. PHYSICS WORLD, 2020, 33 (10) : 12 - 12
  • [10] THE EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-BLIND VERSUS SINGLE-BLIND REVIEWING - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN-ECONOMIC-REVIEW
    BLANK, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1991, 81 (05): : 1041 - 1067