Lymph node density predicts recurrence and death after inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Ball, Mark W. [1 ]
Schwen, Zeyad R. [1 ]
Ko, Joan S. [1 ]
Meyer, Alexa [1 ]
Netto, George J. [1 ,2 ]
Burnett, Arthur L. [1 ]
Bivalacqua, Trinity J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, 600 N Wolfe St,Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Lymph node excision; Neoplasm staging; Penile neoplasms; Survival analysis; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURVIVAL; CYSTECTOMY; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.20
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the impact of lymph node density (LND) on survival after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for penile cancer. Materials and Methods: Our institutional penile cancer database was queried for patients who underwent ILND. Clinicopathologic characteristics including LND and total number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed to determine impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). LND, or the percent of positive LN out of total LN, was calculated as a categorical variable at varying thresholds. Results: Twenty-eight patients with complete follow-up were identified. Indications for ILND were stage >T2 in 20 patients (71.4%), palpable adenopathy in 7 (25%), high grade T1 in 1 (3.6%). Median node yield was 17.5 (interquartile range, 12-22), and positive LNs were found in 14 patients (50%). RFS and OS were significantly lower for patients with >15% LN density (median RFS: 62 months vs. 6.3 months, p=0.0120; median OS: 73.6 months vs. 6.3 months, p<0.001). Controlling for age, medical comorbidities, number of positive LN, T stage, pelvic LN status and indication, LN density >15% was independently associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.6; p=0.04) and OS (HR, 73.6; p=0.002). The c-index for LND was higher than total positive LNs for RFS (0.64 vs. 0.54) and OS (0.79 vs. 0.61). Conclusions: In this small, retrospective penile cancer cohort, the presence of nodal involvement >15% was associated with decreased RFS and OS, and outperformed total number of positive LN as a prognostic indicator.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 25
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lymph node density predicts recurrence and death after inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Kang, Minyong
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2017, 58 (01) : 25 - 26
  • [2] Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: Predictors of lymph node metastasis
    Luchey, Adam
    Espiritu, Patrick
    Gopman, Jared
    Agarwal, Gautum
    Pow-Sang, Julio M.
    Sexton, Wade Jeffers
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (04)
  • [3] Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a contemporary review
    Teh, Jiasian
    Duncan, Catriona
    Qu, Liang
    Guerra, Glen
    Narasimhan, Vignesh
    Pham, Toan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 3210 - 3218
  • [4] Prediction and predicament: complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer
    Meyer, Christian P.
    Hanske, Julian
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (02) : 165 - 165
  • [5] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer With Inguinal Lymph Node Extranodal Extension: A Multicenter Experience
    Li, Zai-Shang
    Han, Hui
    Deng, Chuang-Zhong
    Li, Yong-Hong
    Wu, Chong
    Chen, Peng
    Liu, Zhuo-Wei
    Qin, Zi-Ke
    Zhou, Fang-Jian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [6] Patterns of Recurrence Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: Optimizing Surveillance Strategies
    Chakiryan, Nicholas H.
    Dahmen, Aaron
    Bandini, Marco
    Pederzoli, Filippo
    Marandino, Laura
    Albersen, Maarten
    Roussel, Eduard
    Zhu, Yao
    Ye, Ding-Wei
    Ornellas, Antonio A.
    Catanzaro, Mario
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Haidl, Friederike
    Watkin, Nick
    Ager, Michael
    Chahoud, Jad
    Briganti, Alberto
    Salvioni, Roberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Necchi, Andrea
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (04): : 960 - 968
  • [7] MANAGEMENT OF INGUINAL LYMPH NODE IN PENILE CANCER
    Soontornpun, Surithorn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 105 - 105
  • [8] Is There an Oncological Benefit of Performing Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Penile Cancer and Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis?
    Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
    Basulto-Martinez, Mario
    Sigle, August
    Abufaraj, Mohammad
    Gratzke, Christian
    Miernik, Arkadiusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [9] Inguinal lymph node dissection
    Lupinacci, R. M.
    Benoit, O.
    Peschaud, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2023, 160 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [10] Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: Extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival
    Lont, Anne P.
    Kroon, Bin K.
    Gallee, Maarten P. W.
    van Tinteren, Harm
    Moonen, Luc M. F.
    Horenblas, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (03): : 947 - 952