Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A Cochrane systematic review

被引:25
|
作者
Tangjitgamol, Siriwan [1 ,2 ]
Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal [1 ,2 ]
Laopaiboon, Malinee [3 ]
Lumbiganon, Pisake [4 ]
机构
[1] Bangkok Metropolitan Adm, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
[2] Vajira Hosp, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
[3] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Demog, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Interval debulking surgery; Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; Survival; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; PACLITAXEL; PROGNOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.041
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the effectiveness of interval debulking surgery (IDS) for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, and reference lists for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced stage EOC. The trials had to report survival of women who had primary Surgery and had IDS performed between cycles of chemotherapy comparing to survival of women who had conventional treatment (primary debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy). Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using fixed effects models. Results. Three RCTs, involving 853 women of whom 781 were evaluated, met the inclusion criteria. OSs were substantial heterogeneity between trials (I-2=58%). Subgroup analysis in two trials, wherein the primary surgery was not performed by the gynecologic oncologists, or was less extensive, showed benefit of IDS: hazard ratio=0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 0.9, I-2=0%). Substantial heterogeneity between two trials for PFS evaluating 702 women was also shown (I-2=75%). Toxic reactions to chemotherapy were similar in both arms (RR= 1.3, 95% CI: 0.4 to 3.6). Only one trial reported quality of life, which was generally similar in both treatment anus. Conclusions. Our review could not conclude whether IDS would improve the survival of women with advanced EOC compared with conventional treatment. IDS appeared to yield benefit only in the patients whose primary surgery was not performed by expert surgeons. (c) 2008 Siriwan Tangjitgamol, Sumonmal Manusirivithaya, Malinee Laopaiboon, and Pisake Lumbiganon. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Bryant, Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (01):
  • [2] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04):
  • [3] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [4] Interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Pecorelli, S
    Odicino, F
    Favalli, G
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04): : 573 - 583
  • [5] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Bryant, Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04):
  • [6] Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review
    Victoria Psomiadou
    Anastasia Prodromidou
    Alexandros Fotiou
    Sofia Lekka
    Christos Iavazzo
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 155 - 163
  • [7] Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review
    Psomiadou, Victoria
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Fotiou, Alexandros
    Lekka, Sofia
    Iavazzo, Christos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [8] ROBOTIC INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY FOR ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER. CURRENT CHALLENGE OR FUTURE DIRECTION? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Psomiadou, Victoria
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Fotiou, Alexandros
    Lekka, Sofia
    Iavazzo, Christos R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 : A88 - A88
  • [9] Primary Surgery or Interval Debulking for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Does It Matter?
    Markauskas, Algirdas
    Mogensen, Ole
    Christensen, Rene dePont
    Jensen, Pernille Tine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (08) : 1420 - 1428
  • [10] The role of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Menderes, Gulden
    Black, Jonathan D.
    Azodi, Masoud
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (09) : 899 - 901