Registration of acute stroke: validity in the Danish Stroke Registry and the Danish National Registry of Patients

被引:159
|
作者
Wildenschild, Cathrine [1 ]
Mehnert, Frank [1 ]
Thomsen, Reimar Wernich [1 ]
Iversen, Helle Klingenberg [2 ]
Vestergaard, Karsten [3 ]
Ingeman, Annette [1 ]
Johnsen, Soren Paaske [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Olof Palmes Alle 43-45, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Glostrup Cty Hosp, Dept Neurol, Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aalborg Hosp, Dept Neurol, Aalborg, Denmark
来源
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2014年 / 6卷
关键词
diagnosis; sensitivity; specificity; registries;
D O I
10.2147/CLEP.S50449
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The validity of the registration of patients in stroke-specific registries has seldom been investigated, nor compared with administrative hospital discharge registries. The objective of this study was to examine the validity of the registration of patients in a stroke-specific registry (The Danish Stroke Registry [DSR]) and a hospital discharge registry (The Danish National Patient Registry [DNRP]). Methods: Assuming that all patients with stroke were registered in either the DSR, DNRP or both, we first identified a sample of 75 patients registered with stroke in 2009; 25 patients in the DSR, 25 patients in the DNRP, and 25 patients registered in both data sources. Using the medical record as a gold standard, we then estimated the sensitivity and positive predictive value of a stroke diagnosis in the DSR and the DNRP. Secondly, we reviewed 160 medical records for all potential stroke patients discharged from four major neurologic wards within a 7-day period in 2010, and estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the DSR and the DNRP. Results: Using the first approach, we found a sensitivity of 97% (worst/best case scenario 92%-99%) in the DSR and 79% (worst/best case scenario 73%-84%) in the DNRP. The positive predictive value was 90% (worst/best case scenario 72%-98%) in the DSR and 79% (worst/best case scenario 62%-88%) in the DNRP. Using the second approach, we found a sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81%-96%) and 58% (95% CI 46%-69%) in the DSR and DNRP, respectively. The negative predictive value was 91% (95% CI 83%-96%) in the DSR and 72% (95% CI 62%-80%) in the DNRP. The specificity and positive predictive value did not differ among the registries. Conclusion: Our data suggest a higher sensitivity in the DSR than the DNRP for acute stroke diagnoses, whereas the positive predictive value was comparable in the two data sources.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Validity of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Diagnoses in the Danish Patient Registry and the Danish Stroke Registry
    Hald, Stine Munk
    Sloth, Christine Kring
    Agger, Mikkel
    Schelde-Olesen, Maria Therese
    Hojholt, Miriam
    Hasle, Mette
    Bogetofte, Helle
    Olesrud, Ida
    Binzer, Stefanie
    Madsen, Charlotte
    Krone, Willy
    Garcia Rodriguez, Luis Alberto
    Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi
    Hallas, Jesper
    Gaist, David
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 12 : 1313 - 1325
  • [2] The Danish Stroke Registry
    Johnsen, Soren Paaske
    Ingeman, Annette
    Hundborg, Heidi Holmager
    Schaarup, Susanne Zielke
    Gyllenborg, Jesper
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 8 : 697 - 702
  • [3] Hydatidiform mole: validity of the registration in the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Cancer Registry, and the Danish Pathology Registry 1999-2009
    Lund, Helle
    Vyberg, Mogens
    Eriksen, Helle Hojmark
    Grove, Anni
    Jensen, Annette Ostergaard
    Sunde, Lone
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 10 : 1223 - 1231
  • [4] REGISTRATION OF DIAGNOSES IN THE DANISH NATIONAL REGISTRY OF PATIENTS
    JURGENSEN, HJ
    FROLUND, C
    GUSTAFSEN, J
    MOSBECH, H
    GULDHAMMER, B
    MOSBECH, J
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 1986, 25 (03) : 158 - 164
  • [5] Registration of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Validity in the Danish National Patient Registry
    Levison, Lotte Sahin
    Jepsen, Peter
    Andersen, Henning
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 16 : 409 - 415
  • [6] The Danish National Acute Leukemia Registry
    Ostgard, Lene Sofie Granfeldt
    Norgaard, Jan Maxwell
    Raaschou-Jensen, Klas Kraesten
    Pedersen, Robert Schou
    Ronnov-Jessen, Dorthe
    Pedersen, Per Troellund
    Dufva, Inge Hogh
    Marcher, Claus Werenberg
    Nielsen, Ove Juul
    Severinsen, Marianne Tang
    Friis, Lone Smidstrup
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 8 : 553 - 560
  • [7] Validity of the Prescriber Information in the Danish National Prescription Registry
    Rasmussen, Lotte
    Valentin, Julie
    Gesser, Katarina M.
    Hallas, Jesper
    Pottegard, Anton
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 167 - 167
  • [8] Validity of Cardiovascular Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry
    Sundboll, Jens
    Adelborg, Kasper
    Munch, Troels
    Froslev, Trine
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    Botker, Hans E.
    Schmidt, Morten
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 255 - 255
  • [9] Validity of the Prescriber Information in the Danish National Prescription Registry
    Rasmussen, Lotte
    Valentin, Julie
    Gesser, Katarina Margareta
    Hallas, Jesper
    Pottegard, Anton
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 119 (04) : 376 - 380
  • [10] Validity of First-Time Diagnoses of Inherited Ichthyosis in the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry
    Kristensen, Mattias Hedegaard
    Schmidt, Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir
    Kibsgaard, Line
    Hove, Hanne
    Sommerlund, Mette
    Koppelhus, Uffe
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 12 : 651 - 657