The origins and early elaboration of projectile technology

被引:21
|
作者
O'Driscoll, Corey A. [1 ]
Thompson, Jessica C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Anthropol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY | 2018年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
zooarcheology; hunting lesions; technological adaptations; Pinnacle Point; taphonomy; projectile impact marks; killing from a distance; MIDDLE STONE-AGE; POINT CAVE 13B; WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE; PINNACLE POINT; SOUTH-AFRICA; PALEOLITHIC SITE; HOWIESONS-POORT; HUNTING STRATEGIES; KLASIES-RIVER; EDGE DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1002/evan.21560
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The ability of Homo sapiens to kill prey at a distance is arguably one of the catalysts for our current ecological dominance. Many researchers have suggested its origins lie in the African Middle Stone Age or the European Middle Palaeolithic (approximate to 300-30 thousand years ago), but the perishable components of armatures rarely preserve. Most research on this subject therefore emphasises analysis of armature tip size, shape, and diagnostic impacts or residues. Other lines of evidence have included human skeletal anatomy or analyses of the species composition of faunal assemblages. Projectile Impact Marks (PIMs) on archaeofaunal remains offer an ideal complement to this work, but their potential has been restricted mainly to the later Eurasian zooarchaeological record. A review of current evidence and approaches shows that systematic PIM research could add much to our understanding of early projectile technology, especially in Africa.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 45
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条