Coordination Approaches to Foster Open Innovation R&D Projects Performance

被引:13
|
作者
Paes Leme Barbosa, Ana Paula [1 ]
Salerno, Mario Sergio [1 ]
Brasil, Vinicius Chagas [1 ]
de Souza Nascimento, Paulo Tromboni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Prod Engn Dept, Av Prof Almeida Prado,Travessa 2,128,2 Andar, BR-05508070 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Econ Business Adm & Accounting, Av Prof Luciano Gualberto 908, BR-05508010 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
R&D Open Innovation Projects; Teamwork coordination; Communication; Coordination; Project Management; MANAGEMENT; COLLABORATION; COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; DETERMINANTS; ANTECEDENTS; COOPERATION; PATTERNS; SUCCESS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101603
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Open innovation R&D projects involve teams from different organizations, which may affect the team's ability to communicate since people are from different locations and companies, which may have different priorities, procedures, goals, and expectations. To succeed in the project, the team needs coordination mechanisms that facilitate teamwork. However, in the open innovation R&D projects, the coordination approach that fosters project performance is not evident. Using structural equation modeling analysis (PLS-SEM) with a sample of 50 open innovation R&D projects, we assessed the relationship with the project performance of two coordination approaches (organic or mechanistic) focusing on the communication strategies used. We find evidence that both organic and mechanistic approaches are positively associated with performance, which means that each approach has its role in fostering the project's performance. Consequently, such projects benefit both from open, continuous, and informal communication flow and from a more formal procedure of sharing information through a clear definition of project objectives, evolution, and challenges. This research extends prior research on coordinating teamwork for an open innovation setting.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Configurations of project management practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D projects
    Paes Leme Barbosa, Ana Paula Franco
    Salerno, Mario Sergio
    de Souza Nascimento, Paulo Tromboni
    Albala, Adrian
    Maranzato, Felipe Plana
    Tamoschus, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 39 (02) : 128 - 138
  • [2] Innovation of new IT use: Combining approaches and perspectives in R&D projects
    Ljungberg, F
    Dahlbom, B
    Fagrell, H
    Bergquist, M
    Ljungstrand, P
    [J]. PDC 98: PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARTICIPATORY DESIGN CONFERENCE, 1998, : 203 - 209
  • [3] R&D: Collaboration gets more creative: Unconventional approaches can foster innovation
    Rosenzweig, Mark
    [J]. Chemical Processing, 2020, 82 (01): : 19 - 21
  • [4] Knowledge translation mechanisms in open innovation: the role of design in R&D projects
    Simeone, Luca
    Secundo, Giustina
    Schiuma, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (06) : 1406 - 1429
  • [5] Performance monitoring in R&D projects
    Pillai, AS
    Rao, KS
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 1996, 26 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [6] Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon
    Enkel, Ellen
    Gassmann, Oliver
    Chesbrough, Henry
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2009, 39 (04) : 311 - 316
  • [7] Innovation capabilities for global R&D projects in subsidiaries
    Tarraco, Elisangela Lazarou
    Bernardes, Roberto Carlos
    Borini, Felipe Mendes
    Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 22 (04) : 639 - 659
  • [8] Reinventing R&D in an Open Innovation Ecosystem
    Traitler, Helmut
    Watzke, Heribert J.
    Saguy, I. Sam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2011, 76 (02) : R62 - R68
  • [9] Multiple aspects of R&D must be optimized to foster innovation
    Aeschbacher, R
    [J]. CHIMIA, 2005, 59 (03) : 126 - 128
  • [10] Open innovation and patterns of R&D competition
    Lim, Kwanghui
    Chesbrough, Henry
    Ruan, Yi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 52 (3-4) : 295 - 321