Eliminating the phrase "elective abortion": why language matters

被引:20
|
作者
Janiak, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
Goldberg, Alisa B. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Planned Parenthood League Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
PREGNANCY; HEALTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The phrase "elective abortion" is often used to describe induced abortions performed for reasons other than a direct, immediate threat to maternal physical health. We argue that the term "elective abortion" is variably defined, misrepresents the complexity and multiplicity of indications for abortion and perpetuates stigma. In practice, restricting access to abortion at the legal, regulatory or institutional level based on subjective perceptions of patient need constrains health care providers' ability to act according to their best clinical judgments and limits patient access to care. The phrase "elective abortion" should be eliminated from scientific and medical discourse to prevent further damage to the public understanding of the variety of indications for which women require expeditious and equitable access to induced abortion. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 92
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条