Determinants of Representatives' Votes on the Flake Amendment to End National Science Foundation Funding of Political Science Research

被引:1
|
作者
Uscinski, Joseph E. [1 ]
Klofstad, Casey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1049096513000504
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In May 2012, political scientists learned of efforts by representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ) to eliminate political science funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) budget. The American Political Science Association (APSA) was caught off-guard, and concerned political scientists scrambled to contact their representatives and urge the amendment's defeat. Flake's initial effort to cut funds overall from the NSF was defeated, but a second measure, specifically to keep the NSF from funding political science, passed only hours later. This was the second time in three years that legislators targeted the NSF Political Science Program. Although these measures have been sponsored and widely supported by Republicans, some Democrats have supported these measures as well. This article examines the vote on the Flake Amendment to understand why individual representatives voted for or against cutting NSF funding for political science research.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 561
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条