Simple and cost-effective powder disperser for aerosol particle size measurement

被引:24
|
作者
Tang, P. [1 ]
Fletcher, D. F. [2 ]
Chan, H. -K. [1 ]
Raper, J. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Missouri Rolla, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
关键词
Powder disperser; Size measurement; Aerosol;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2008.01.003
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Commercial dry powder dispersers needed in conjunction with particle size measurement equipment are usually quite expensive (of the order of thousands of dollars). We have found that a simple vacuum generator can be used as a cost-effective disperser (US$50). Comparison with other commercial dispersers, small scale powder disperser (SSPD) model 3433 (TSI, Shoreview, USA) and Scirocco dry powder disperser (Malvern, Worcs, UK), showed that our disperser worked as efficiently as these expensive dispersers. Crystalline mannitol (less than 1% moisture content) and amorphous BSA (8.5-9.2% moisture content) smooth spherical particles were used to test the dispersion capability of the unit. Smooth spherical particles were chosen because they are more cohesive than corrugated particles due to increased contact points. Therefore, sufficient dispersions of other less cohesive particles should be able to be achieved using the optimum conditions reported here. The effects of air pressure, sample weight, and nozzle size of the disperser were investigated. Comparison of the particle size distributions between wet and dry measurements were used to determine the dispersion efficiency. Quantitative comparisons were made using the values of D(v,0.5) and span. The best dispersion was found using a 1.00 mm nozzle and the maximum percentage differences in D(v,0.5) and span are 23% and 19%, respectively, with more than 200 mg mannitol powder dispersed with pressures of 50, 70, 90 psi. Using BSA powders, the maximum percentage differences of D(v,0.5) and span are 37% and 25%, respectively. As was the case for the commercial devices, the dispersion of BSA particles could not be improved even when the pressure of the compressed air was increased. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oscillatory flowmeters offer simple, cost-effective measurement solution
    Hunt, RC
    [J]. CONTROL SOLUTIONS, 2002, 75 (03): : 34 - +
  • [2] Cost-effective way of improving the optical properties of phosphor-in-glass by adjusting the particle size of glass powder
    Hong, Mingdong
    Chen, Chao
    Wang, Huanping
    Lei, Ruoshan
    Hua, Youjie
    Wang, Zhiyang
    Mo, Zhiwei
    Xu, Shiqing
    [J]. CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 49 (13) : 22547 - 22554
  • [3] COST-EFFECTIVE RETENTION MEASUREMENT
    不详
    [J]. PIMA MAGAZINE, 1994, 76 (03): : S4 - S4
  • [4] A Simple and Cost-effective Technique for Vertebroplasty
    Bharti, Ajay
    Swaroop, Anand
    Kumar, Pramod
    Rawat, Ashok
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 30 (01) : 29 - 31
  • [5] ACCUMULATORS FOR SIMPLE, COST-EFFECTIVE CONTROL
    RICH, FS
    [J]. MACHINE DESIGN, 1983, 55 (09) : 66 - 70
  • [6] SIMPLE CSII IS HIGHLY COST-EFFECTIVE
    Henriksen, O.
    Dall, M.
    Parkin, C.
    Warner, J.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 17 : A10 - A10
  • [7] An efficient, cost-effective and simple solution
    不详
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 227 (12) : 1073 - 1073
  • [8] Simple, cost-effective patterning techniques
    Newby, Bi-min Zhang
    Cai, Yangjun
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [9] Simple CSII Is Highly Cost-Effective
    Henriksen, Ole
    Dall, Mads
    Warner, Jay
    Parkin, Christopher
    [J]. DIABETES, 2015, 64 : A350 - A350
  • [10] A Simple, Cost-effective Microsuction Device
    Alfaqeeh, Faisal A.
    Alhusain, Abdullah M.
    Andejani, Doaa
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (09) : E5233