Post-occupancy evaluation in architecture: experiences and perspectives from UK practice

被引:52
|
作者
Hay, Rowena [1 ]
Samuel, Flora [1 ]
Watson, Kelly J. [2 ]
Bradbury, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Architecture, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Art Design & Architecture, Plymouth, Devon, England
来源
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION | 2018年 / 46卷 / 06期
基金
英国艺术与人文研究理事会;
关键词
architects; architectural practice; building performance evaluation; post-occupancy evaluation; practice-based research; sustainability; ASSESSING BUILDING PERFORMANCE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DESIGN QUALITY; FEEDBACK; PROFESSIONALISM; KNOWLEDGE; LOOP; TOOL;
D O I
10.1080/09613218.2017.1314692
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The importance of post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is widely acknowledged in the academic literature, industry press and, increasingly, by professional institutes. Learning from previous projects systematically is central to improving building performance, resulting in a built environment that better fits the needs of clients, end users, wider society and the environment. The key role of architects in pushing forward this agenda has been recognized, however evidence suggests that take up of POE is low across the profession. Whilst research has investigated barriers to POE across the construction industry, very little has considered the unique perspective of architects. In-depth interviews with UK-based architects are presented to explore their experiences in relation to POE and their perspectives on its potential to be a standard part of architectural practice. The findings indicate that a considerable amount of practical work is being undertaken, but uncertainty over what constitutes POE means it is often excluded from the POE label- with significant implications for the development of a rigorous evidence base. An appetite is identified for more holistic evaluation measures that move beyond the current preoccupation with energy efficiency to consider other aspects of building performance, and thereby sustainability, in a wider value framework.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 710
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] A critique of post-occupancy evaluation in the UK
    Isaiah Oluremi Durosaiye
    Karim Hadjri
    Champika Lasanthi Liyanage
    [J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2019, 34 : 345 - 352
  • [3] A critique of post-occupancy evaluation in the UK
    Durosaiye, Isaiah Oluremi
    Hadjri, Karim
    Liyanage, Champika Lasanthi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOUSING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 34 (01) : 345 - 352
  • [4] Findings from a post-occupancy evaluation in the UK primary schools sector
    Zhang, Yufan
    Barrett, Peter
    [J]. FACILITIES, 2010, 28 (13-14) : 641 - 656
  • [5] POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION - AN OVERVIEW
    ZIMRING, CM
    REIZENSTEIN, JE
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1980, 12 (04) : 429 - 450
  • [6] Who is post-occupancy evaluation for?
    Roberts, P
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2001, 29 (06): : 463 - 465
  • [7] EVALUATION + POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION - EDUCATION
    KRAUS, M
    [J]. AIA JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1976, 65 (11): : 102 - 102
  • [8] Principal contractor involvement in post-occupancy evaluation in the UK construction industry
    Williams, Tristan
    Bouchlaghem, Dino
    Loveday, Dennis
    Law, Charlie
    [J]. FACILITIES, 2013, 31 (1-2) : 39 - 55
  • [9] Post-occupancy evaluation and sustainability: a review
    Stevenson, F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2009, 162 (03) : 123 - 130
  • [10] Post-occupancy evaluation of the Forrestal building
    Sanders, PA
    Collins, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY, 1996, 25 (02): : 89 - &