Producer responsibility, waste minimisation and the WEEE Directive: Case studies in eco-design from the European lighting sector

被引:113
|
作者
Gottberg, A
Morris, J [1 ]
Pollard, S
Mark-Herbert, C
Cook, M
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Inst Water & Environm, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Integrated Waste Management Ctr, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
extended producer responsibility; eco-design; environmental policy; WEEE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.07.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The EU Directive on Waste Electrical and Electrical Equipment (WEEE) (2002/96/EC), to be implemented in stages from August 2004, attempts to tackle the growing quantity WEEE by making producers responsible for the costs of the collection and recycling of their products at the end of usable life. This is considered to give producers a financial incentive to reduce waste at source through eco-design. This link is, however, under-researched and little is known generally about the effectiveness of extended producer responsibility (EPR) and policies to promote it. This paper presents the findings of an exploratory study to address these important gaps in knowledge. Literature review was used to develop an analytical framework to explain the relationships between the drivers for eco-design and the role of policies to promote EPR. This was applied to eight case studies of firms from the European lighting sector. While quantitative data to confirm the link between EPR and eco-design were difficult to obtain, the case studies showed that EPR has had little effect on product development so far. Within the sector studied, most producers have been able to pass on incremental costs associated with EPR to customers with negligible effects on sales. This reflects perceptions in the lighting sector that, because demand for products is relatively price inelastic and the regulation affects all producers equally, EPR is unlikely to drive eco-design at least in the short run. The cases also showed that choice between individual and centrally provided waste recovery schemes rested on perceptions of relative costs and practicability. It was evident that other drivers, such as bans on hazardous substances, product declarations and supply chain pressures, were often more effective promoters of eco-design, Thus it seems a mix of policy measures is required rather than reliance on economic instruments alone. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 56
页数:19
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design
    Eugénie Joltreau
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 83 : 527 - 578
  • [2] Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design
    Joltreau, Eugenie
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 83 (03): : 527 - 578
  • [3] Extended Producer Responsibility and Eco-Design Changes: Perspectives from China
    Yu, Jieqiong
    Hills, Peter
    Welford, Richard
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 15 (02) : 111 - 124
  • [4] Extended producer responsibility for waste tyres in the EU: Lessons learnt from three case studies - Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands
    Winternitz, Kim
    Heggie, Mark
    Baird, Jim
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 89 : 386 - 396