Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes - a systematic review of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria

被引:406
|
作者
Wendland, Eliana M. [1 ]
Torloni, Maria Regina [2 ]
Falavigna, Maicon [3 ]
Trujillo, Janet [3 ]
Dode, Maria Alice [4 ]
Campos, Maria Amelia [5 ]
Duncan, Bruce B. [3 ]
Schmidt, Maria Ines [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Hlth Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
[5] Conceicao Hosp, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST; MELLITUS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-12-23
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Two criteria based on a 2 h 75 g OGTT are being used for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM), those recommended over the years by the World Health Organization ( WHO), and those recently recommended by the International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG), the latter generated in the HAPO study and based on pregnancy outcomes. Our aim is to systematically review the evidence for the associations between GDM ( according to these criteria) and adverse outcomes. Methods: We searched relevant studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Cochrane Library, CINHAL, WHO-Afro library, IMSEAR, EMCAT, IMEMR and WPRIM. We included cohort studies permitting the evaluation of GDM diagnosed by WHO and or IADPSG criteria against adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in untreated women. Only studies with universal application of a 75 g OGTT were included. Relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained for each study. We combined study results using a random-effects model. Inconsistency across studies was defined by an inconsistency index (I-2) > 50%. Results: Data were extracted from eight studies, totaling 44,829 women. Greater risk of adverse outcomes was observed for both diagnostic criteria. When using the WHO criteria, consistent associations were seen for macrosomia (RR = 1.81; 95%CI 1.47-2.22; p < 0.001); large for gestational age ( RR = 1.53; 95%CI 1.39-1.69; p < 0.001); perinatal mortality (RR = 1.55; 95% CI 0.88-2.73; p = 0.13); preeclampsia (RR = 1.69; 95%CI 1.31-2.18; p < 0.001); and cesarean delivery (RR = 1.37; 95%CI 1.24-1.51; p < 0.001). Less data were available for the IADPSG criteria, and associations were inconsistent across studies (I-2 >= 73%). Magnitudes of RRs and their 95%CIs were 1.73 (1.282.35; p = 0.001) for large for gestational age; 1.71 (1.38-2.13; p < 0.001) for preeclampsia; and 1.23 (1.01-1.51; p = 0.04) for cesarean delivery. Excluding either the HAPO or the EBDG studies minimally altered these associations, but the RRs seen for the IADPSG criteria were reduced after excluding HAPO. Conclusions: The WHO and the IADPSG criteria for GDM identified women at a small increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Associations were of similar magnitude for both criteria. However, high inconsistency was seen for those with the IADPSG criteria. Full evaluation of the latter in settings other than HAPO requires additional studies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes - a systematic review of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria
    Eliana M Wendland
    Maria Regina Torloni
    Maicon Falavigna
    Janet Trujillo
    Maria Alice Dode
    Maria Amélia Campos
    Bruce B Duncan
    Maria Inês Schmidt
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12
  • [2] World Health Organization (WHO) versus International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes mellitus and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Basri, N.
    Ismail, Mohamed N. A.
    Mahdy, Abdullah Z.
    Ahmad, S.
    Karim, Abdul A. K.
    Manaf, Abdul M. R.
    Lim, P. S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 107 - 108
  • [3] The implications of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes
    Holt, R. I. G.
    Coleman, M. A.
    McCance, D. R.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (04) : 382 - 385
  • [4] The World Health Organization (WHO) versus The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Basri, Nurul Iftida
    Mandy, Zaleha Abdullah
    Ahmad, Shuhaila
    Karim, Abdul Kadir Abdul
    Shan, Lim Pei
    Mang, Mohd Rizal Abdul
    Ismail, Nor Azlin Mohd
    [J]. HORMONE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2018, 34 (01)
  • [5] Impact of introducing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria on pregnancy outcomes in Japan
    Shindo, Ryosuke
    Aoki, Shigeru
    Kasai, Junko
    Saigusa, Yusuke
    Nakanishi, Sayuri
    Miyagi, Etsuko
    [J]. ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2020, 67 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [6] Effect of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria on diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
    Ghosh, M.
    Dawidziak, M.
    Viswanath, A.
    Raghavan, R.
    Churchill, D.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 153 - 154
  • [7] Feto-maternal outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria
    Nayak, Prasanta Kumar
    Mitra, Subarna
    Sahoo, Jaya Prakash
    Daniel, Mary
    Mathew, Agnes
    Padma, Alaganandam
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2013, 7 (04) : 206 - 209
  • [8] Pregnancy Outcomes of Women Additionally Diagnosed as Gestational Diabetes by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria
    Kim, Min Hyoung
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Kim, Sung-Hoon
    Hong, Joon Seok
    Chung, Hye Rim
    Choi, Sung Hee
    Kim, Moon Young
    Jang, Hak C.
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2019, 43 (06) : 766 - 775
  • [9] Comparison of the American Diabetes Association and World Health Organization criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus and the outcomes of pregnancy
    Sahu, Latika
    Satyakala, R.
    Rani, Reddi
    [J]. OBSTETRIC MEDICINE, 2009, 2 (04) : 149 - 153
  • [10] Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes
    Trujillo, Janet
    Vigo, Alvaro
    Duncan, Bruce B.
    Falavigna, Maicon
    Wendland, Eliana M.
    Campos, Maria A.
    Schmidt, Maria I.
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 108 (02) : 288 - 295