General or regional? Exploring patients' anaesthetic preferences and perception of regional anaesthesia

被引:8
|
作者
Lavado, J. S. [1 ]
Goncalves, D. [1 ]
Goncalves, L. [1 ]
Sendino, C. [1 ]
Valente, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Leiria, Dept Anestesiol, Leiria, Portugal
来源
关键词
Regional anaesthesia; General anaesthesia; Fear; Knowledge; Patient preference; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.redar.2018.12.004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction and objectives: Regional anaesthesia (RA) has gained popularity due to its numerous benefits and increasing safety. Yet, often patients refuse this procedure and prefer general anaesthesia (GA). This study aimed to investigate variables (demographic factors, safety perception of GA and RA, patients' fears, anxiety, and knowledge) related to patients' anaesthetic preference. Material and methods: Participants were patients aged 18 years or more proposed to an anaesthesia appointment for preoperative assessment. Patients completed a written questionnaire before meeting the anaesthesiologist. The questionnaire asked about their preferences, fears and perceptions about RA. Results: One hundred and 2 patients agreed to participate. Mean age was 52.6 +/- 13.5 years, 57.8% were female and 44.5% had at least 12 years of education. Given the choice, 54.0% would prefer GA and 20.7% said they would refuse RA if proposed by the anaesthesiologist. Among patients who already experienced neuroaxial anaesthesia, 40.0% said they did not wish to repeat it. Patients who preferred GA over RA perceived GA to be safer than RA and expressed more anxiety towards being awake during surgery and more fear of feeling pain during surgery, of having back pain, and of needle puncture. Results also suggested that patients are unaware of RA's real risks and benefits. Conclusions: Knowing patients' fears is essential for the anaesthesiologist address their patients' needs. Anaesthesiologists should work on improving general population perspective and knowledge about RA. (C) 2018 Sociedad Espanola de Anestesiologia, Reanimacion y Terapeutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 205
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] General anaesthesia vs loco-regional anaesthesia in prevention of anaesthetic complications in obstetrics
    Brauneis, S
    Moccia, S
    Bastianelli, C
    Massullo, D
    Apponi, F
    Di Biase, M
    Luzi, M
    Turkiewicz, AM
    Pinto, G
    [J]. FIRST WORLD CONGRESS ON MATERNAL MORTALITY, 1997, : 211 - 216
  • [2] Complications and local anaesthetic toxicity in regional anaesthesia
    Veering, Bernadette T.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 16 (05) : 455 - 459
  • [3] The effect of regional and general anaesthesia on activation of beta-herpesviruses and immune response in patients undergoing general or regional anaesthesia
    Mamaja, B.
    Donina, S.
    Vilks, A.
    Sabelnikovs, O.
    Murovska, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 135 - 135
  • [4] Neuroimmunomodulation by regional and general anaesthesia
    Sakic, Katarina
    Zura, Marijana
    Sakic, Livija
    Vrbanovic, Vilena
    Bagatin, Dinko
    [J]. PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2009, 111 (02) : 209 - 214
  • [5] Regional block or general anaesthesia?
    Al-Haddad, M
    Coventry, DM
    [J]. HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2003, 64 (08): : 500 - 500
  • [6] Regional anaesthesia -: before or after general anaesthesia?
    Grüning, T
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (01) : 86 - 87
  • [7] Regional anaesthesia - before or after general anaesthesia?
    Fischer, HBJ
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (08) : 727 - 729
  • [8] Influence of general and regional anaesthesia on outcome
    Steinfeldt, T.
    Wiesmann, T.
    [J]. ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2022, 63 : 372 - 379
  • [9] Regional or general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy
    Stoneham, Mark D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (01) : 45 - 46
  • [10] Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: General vs regional anaesthesia
    Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Singh
    Kulshrestha, Ashish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2016, 12 (01) : 4 - 9