Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: A cross-cultural model

被引:24
|
作者
Syme, GJ
Kals, E
Nancarrow, BE
Montada, L
机构
[1] CSIRO, Australian Res Ctr Water Soc, Land & Water, Wembley, WA 6014, Australia
[2] Univ Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2006年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
ecological risks; justice; equity; community; fairness judgments;
D O I
10.1080/10807030500430443
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision-making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports a community-based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual pro-environmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self-interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles including distributive (within or between generations), procedural and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 119
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: A cross-cultural model
    Syme, GJ
    Kals, E
    Nancarrow, BE
    Montada, L
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (06) : 905 - 916
  • [2] Perceptions of fairness in the justice system: A cross-cultural comparison
    Anderson, RA
    Otto, AL
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2003, 31 (06): : 557 - 563
  • [3] CROSS-CULTURAL SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTIONS OF FAIRNESS
    BERMAN, JJ
    MURPHYBERMAN, V
    SINGH, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 16 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [4] Beyond Justice as Fairness: Rethinking Rawls from a Cross-Cultural Perspective
    Dombrowski, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE, 2021, 63 (03) : 511 - 513
  • [5] Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Water Risks and Solutions Across Select Sites
    Larson, Kelli L.
    Stotts, Rhian
    Wutich, Amber
    Brewis, Alexandra
    White, Dave
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 29 (09) : 1049 - 1064
  • [6] Researching Community Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland: A Cross-Cultural Challenge
    Eriksson, Anna
    [J]. VICTIMS & OFFENDERS, 2011, 6 (03) : 260 - 274
  • [7] Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Risks and Tenables among Native Amazonians in Northeastern Ecuador
    Lu, Flora
    Silva, Nestor L.
    Villeda, Krysta
    Sorensen, Mark
    [J]. HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 2014, 73 (04) : 375 - 388
  • [8] Rules, Norms, and Injustice: A Cross-Cultural Study of Perceptions of Justice in Water Institutions
    Wutich, Amber
    Brewis, Alexandra
    York, Abigail M.
    Stotts, Rhian
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (07) : 795 - 809
  • [9] Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice - A comparison of Hong kong and Indonesia
    Murphy-Berman, V
    Berman, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 33 (02) : 157 - 170
  • [10] Ecological and cultural perspectives in cross-cultural psychology
    Berry, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 422 - 422